Abstract:Research shows that gang-associated youth are less likely to complete high school and earn a postsecondary educational credential. However, scholars have not determined “why” gang youth do not persist into higher education. This ethnographic study aims to focus on the narratives of 13 Latino high school young men to understand what college knowledge they possess. We found the students have aspirations to pursue postsecondary education degrees or credentials; however, they receive minimal information and suppor… Show more
“…In a separate study, Latino students recounted how counselors tracked them toward less selective institutions despite clear academic qualifications and eligibility for financial assistance (Ballysingh, 2019b). Findings such as these may explain why Latinx/a/o students anticipate postsecondary institutional obstacles during college choice and transition (Acevedo-Gil, 2019), why college planning and preparation do not match college aspirations (Huerta et al, 2020), and why many Latinos, in particular, must leverage cultural capital, such as maternal cultural wealth, in lieu of adequate institutional support to pursue college (Ballysingh, 2019a).…”
This study extends prior work on the college-going efforts of Latino boys and adolescents (Latinos) by examining the extent to which meeting with a school counselor is related to their college-going aspirations and whether they apply to and ultimately matriculate to college. The study utilizes social capital and social reproduction theories to hypothesize about school counselors’ role in Latinos’ postsecondary matriculation. Utilizing data from the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009, we used logistic regression to test the hypotheses that contact with a school counselor is related to an increased likelihood of intent to matriculate, application to 4-year institutions, and enrollment in college. We found that Latinos were just as likely as their White counterparts to aspire to college and just as likely to enroll if they applied. Moreover, those odds were not related to having visited a school counselor in ninth or 11th grade. We also found that Latinos who met with a school counselor in ninth grade were significantly less likely to apply to a 4-year institution while those who met with a counselor in 11th grade were significantly more likely to apply. We discuss the implications of our findings in light of existing research and make recommendations for future research and practice.
“…In a separate study, Latino students recounted how counselors tracked them toward less selective institutions despite clear academic qualifications and eligibility for financial assistance (Ballysingh, 2019b). Findings such as these may explain why Latinx/a/o students anticipate postsecondary institutional obstacles during college choice and transition (Acevedo-Gil, 2019), why college planning and preparation do not match college aspirations (Huerta et al, 2020), and why many Latinos, in particular, must leverage cultural capital, such as maternal cultural wealth, in lieu of adequate institutional support to pursue college (Ballysingh, 2019a).…”
This study extends prior work on the college-going efforts of Latino boys and adolescents (Latinos) by examining the extent to which meeting with a school counselor is related to their college-going aspirations and whether they apply to and ultimately matriculate to college. The study utilizes social capital and social reproduction theories to hypothesize about school counselors’ role in Latinos’ postsecondary matriculation. Utilizing data from the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009, we used logistic regression to test the hypotheses that contact with a school counselor is related to an increased likelihood of intent to matriculate, application to 4-year institutions, and enrollment in college. We found that Latinos were just as likely as their White counterparts to aspire to college and just as likely to enroll if they applied. Moreover, those odds were not related to having visited a school counselor in ninth or 11th grade. We also found that Latinos who met with a school counselor in ninth grade were significantly less likely to apply to a 4-year institution while those who met with a counselor in 11th grade were significantly more likely to apply. We discuss the implications of our findings in light of existing research and make recommendations for future research and practice.
“…At that point, targeted advocacy will be able tip the scales of power, moving necessary conversations about policy and procedures from the grottoes and catacombs of the university to the recognized spaces backed by institutional charters and supported by concrete university investment. In the meantime, continued research is needed to further establish the value of “gifts” (Halkovic & Greene, 2015; Halkovic et al, 2013), hustle, or skillsets formerly incarcerated and other non-traditional and justice-impacted students bring to universities (Giraldo et al, 2017; Huerta et al, in press). Until the embedded power structures in higher education create more welcoming pathways for formerly incarcerated students to become a protected group, formerly incarcerated students are parlayed within the university’s ability to showcase and include this population as a part of their diversity efforts.…”
In this special issue, the five previous articles trace the longstanding presence and integration of carceral practices in both K-12 and postsecondary education systems. As illuminated by the authors, carceral practices disproportionately criminalize students of color and impact pathways, trajectories, and how educational opportunities are experienced. In our review and closing comments for this special issue, we expand and share three emergent themes running throughout this volume: 1) Power Analysis, an investigation of macro systems and structures that determine specific contexts entrapping current and prospective students in the carceral system; 2) Worth/Value, an interrogation of the paradigms contributing to the devaluation, and ultimate criminalization, of Black and Latinx students within educational spaces; 3) Reform or Reimagine?, an inquiry and challenge on whether to advance with useful, but insufficient, changes to an unjust system or a move forward with new wide-sweeping and radical approaches to minimize damage to individuals. Our paper concludes with reimagining educational systems using these more radical approaches.
“…As Harper and Williams observed, social scientists have learned much already about the multiple institutional failures that prevent boys of color from positively transitioning into adulthood. For instance, researchers have established that Black and Latino boys are disproportionately subjected to aggressive disciplinary practices in school (Howard, 2014; Musto, 2019); that boys of color who are suspected of having associations with gangs tend to face particularly harsh discipline in schools (Huerta et al, 2020); that school suspensions and expulsions predict increased contact with the juvenile justice system and subsequent arrests (Mittleman, 2018), and that increased justice contact negatively impacts academic performance and college attendance (Johnson, 2015; Shedd, 2015). However, noted Harper and Williams, while the evidence shows that harsh disciplinary practices — suspending and expelling these students for minor infractions, and then pushing them out and away from schooling environments — are ineffective (Wood et al, 2018), much less is known about the institutional policies, practices, and other factors that lead to positive outcomes for these students.…”
Section: Listening To and Learnings From Successful Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just like other young people, then, Black and Latino boys deserve effective counseling that can help them translate their ambitions into concrete plans (Ballysingh, 2019; Carey, 2019; Huerta et al, 2020). And yet, previous research suggests that high school boys (of all races and ethnicities) tend to be less likely than girls to seek out college information and support from counselors (Bryan et al, 2009).…”
Section: Listening To and Learnings From Successful Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And that’s no less true for those who struggle in school or have criminal records. For instance, even the most “hardened” gang members want their younger male siblings to do well in school and stay out of trouble (Huerta et al, 2020; Rios, 2017). And the students who act out the most are often themselves striving to overcome trauma, violence, and victimization (Huerta, 2018; Peguero, 2011).…”
Section: Listening To and Learnings From Successful Studentsmentioning
The educational experiences of Black and Latino males in K-12 are often riddled with unnecessary challenges and stresses that contribute to diminished academic outcomes. Adrian H. Huerta, Tyrone C. Howard, and Bianca N. Haro seek to highlight instead the importance of positive asset-based research and practice efforts focused on supporting Black and Latino male high school students. Based on a yearlong study of more than 200 Black and Latino male youth in six urban high schools in California, they provide recommendations for more effectively studying and supporting this population. The combination of asset-based research and practice drawn from that research is intended to better support, engage, and enhance the educational experiences of Black and Latino male students in K-12 institutions and beyond.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.