Collective Learning and Institutional Collective Action in Fragmented Governance

Kim, Serena; Swann, William L.; Feiock, Richard C.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47150-7_15

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Literature on IORs also indicates organizational cooperation is always linked with risk. It is defined as the probable failure of collaboration to accomplish collective objectives (Oskam et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020). It is believed that providing actors with credible commitments is essential to establishing trust and overcoming defection risks in collective action (Feiock, 2013).…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inclusive urban entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploration of factors affecting organizational ambidexterity

Shakiba

Pazhouhan

Amiri

et al. 2023

Ann Public Coop Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the main challenges inclusive urban entrepreneurial ecosystems (IUEEs) face is balancing their organizations' two opposing individual and cooperative activities. The closest concept in the management of dual structures is the so‐called organizational ambidexterity (OA). We refer to it as “Individual–Collective Organizational Ambidexterity”. Thus, it is necessary to explore factors affecting the OA of the IUEE's organizations to benefit simultaneously from individual and collective potentials and form successfully. To do so, a model was designed by examining the factors affecting the OA capacity of the IUEE's organizations. The statistical population was organizations involved in the IUEE of 36 cities in Kermanshah province, one of the poorest provinces in IRAN (N = 2041). 328 valid responses were collected as statistical sample based on the sampling table of Krejcie and Morgan (from 1970), and through the proportional stratified sampling method. The main instrument was a questionnaire. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 26 and Smartpls3 software. The results showed among the factors studied, diversity, learning orientation, and promotion of entrepreneurial culture had a positive and significant effect on OA. Networking capacities and commitment to collaboration in the ecosystem did not significantly affect OA. OA also had a positive and significant effect on the performance of IUEE. The discussion eventually suggests the future directions of the research. The findings of this study can be used to develop IUEEs and achieve entrepreneurial cities.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inclusive urban entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploration of factors affecting organizational ambidexterity

Shakiba

Pazhouhan

Amiri

et al. 2023

Ann Public Coop Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Collective Learning and Collaboration Risk. ICA scholars have begun theoretically exploring how collective learning can mitigate collaboration risk and promote collective action (Kim, Swann, & Feiock, 2020). For example, integration mechanisms involving multiple organizations can facilitate "collective learning" or the acquisition, assessment, and dissemination of new knowledge among participants (Heikkila & Gerlak, 2013).…”

Section: What We Still Need To Know About Icamentioning

confidence: 99%

Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework

Kim¹,

Swann²,

Weible³

et al. 2020

Policy Studies Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Institutional Collective Action (ICA) framework has contributed to understanding collective action problems in fragmented governance and identified mechanisms for overcoming them. Participation in collaboration is risky--even if it has the potential to make all parties better off. This framework has uniquely shown how collaboration risk and other transaction costs can be overcome to create effective collaborations for addressing complex policy issues. However, after over a decade of use, the framework is due for critical evaluation and articulation of its state of the art and science to better inform future scholarship. For this purpose, this article defines key concepts and formulates assumptions, as well as reviews the empirical contributions and longstanding limitations of the ICA framework. A robust agenda for future research is also outlined. To move forward, we believe ICA research should focus on the foundational core of the ICA framework, maintain flexibility in explanatory models, and expand the scope beyond the collective action problems at the local level.

show abstract

On the Reflexive Relations Between Knowledge, Governance, and Space

Glückler

Herrigel

Handke

2020

Knowledge for Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governance is both a contested concept and an increasingly empirical concern. On the one hand, it has become an almost universal and all-encompassing concept, which has attracted scholarly interest from many disciplines and over many decades to tackle the dilemmas of collective action and to facilitate effective coordination of interests and resources toward commonly accepted goals. On the other hand, conceptions of governance vary considerably, and their meanings depend on disciplinary perspectives, theoretical traditions, and empirical focus. Although it is easy to agree what governance is not, it is more challenging to create broad consensus on what it is and how it works effectively. Most capaciously, governance denotes the coordination of collective action. These actions take place in institutionally or physically organized spaces of interaction, where knowledge is needed to shape governance appropriately. Organized spaces and knowledge are both conditions as well as consequences of the governance process.

show abstract

Collective Learning and Institutional Collective Action in Fragmented Governance

Cited by 5 publications

References 64 publications

Inclusive urban entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploration of factors affecting organizational ambidexterity

Inclusive urban entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploration of factors affecting organizational ambidexterity

Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework

On the Reflexive Relations Between Knowledge, Governance, and Space

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About