Collection of Data on Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity by U.S. Public Health Data and Monitoring Systems, 2015–2018

Abstract

We aimed to assess Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data systems on the extent of data collection on sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity as well as on age and race/ethnicity. Between March and September 2019, we searched 11 federal websites to identify CDC-supported or -led U.S. data systems active between 2015 and 2018. We searched the systems’ website, documentation, and publications for evidence of data collection on sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, and race/ethnicity. We categorized each system by type (disease notification, periodic prevalence survey, registry/vital record, or multiple sources). We provide descriptive statistics of characteristics of the identified systems. Most (94.1%) systems we assessed collected data on sex. All systems collected data on age, and approximately 80% collected data on race/ethnicity. Only 17.7% collected data on sexual orientation and 5.9% on gender identity. Periodic prevalence surveys were the most common system type for collecting all the variables we assessed. While most U.S. public health data and monitoring systems collect data disaggregated by sex, age, and race/ethnicity, far fewer do so for sexual orientation or gender identity. Standards and examples exist to aid efforts to collect and report these vitally important data. Additionally important is increasing accessibility and appropriately tailored dissemination of reports of these data to public health professionals and other collaborators.

Sex and gender differences in upper extremity prosthesis rejection: A review of literature

“…2,3 These findings are consistent with a review of US Health Data and monitoring systems which revealed that although most (94.1%) systems collected data on sex, only 5.9% collected data on gender identity. 16 Second, there are a limited number of studies that analyzed differences in sex or gender even when data on demographics of the population surveyed were recorded. This approach is at odds with the recommendations to collect and disaggregate data on sex, gender identify, and other important demographic variables when possible.…”

Teaching Concepts of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Social Responsibility Through Elementary Statistics

“…A specific example for Module 8 is as follows: instead of three intensive readings on the mismeasurement of gender and sexuality in data collection leading to disparities in the availability of ICOTS11 (2022) Invited Paper -Refereed (DOI: 10.52041/iase.icots11.T1F3) public health data for gender and sexuality minorities (Kress et al, 2021;MacCarthy & Elliott, 2021;Westbrook & Saperstein, 2015), a single video will be assigned that describes basic information regarding gender and sexuality in seven minutes (e.g., Osmosis from Elsevier, 2020). Then students will be asked to think about surveys they have taken and how gender has been represented, and to answer the question "If gender is collected as binary, what repercussions could exist for non-cisgender individuals?"…”

Emphasizing Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Capture for Improved Cardiovascular Care of the LGBTQ+ Population

“…Furthermore, studies show that cities with protective sexual orientation nondiscrimination laws and policies were more likely to collect and report SOGIE data . Despite improved SOGIE data collection in these settings, reporting such data continues to be limited and absent on many federal websites …”