2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaterals and the recovery of left ventricular function after recanalization of a chronic total coronary occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility of LV functional recovery with its beneficial effect on survival provides the rationale for the technically demanding attempt to recanalize a CTO. 35 The recovery of impaired systolic LV function after revascularization of a CTO appears not to depend on the quality of collateral function, 36 suggesting that collateral development does not depend on the presence of viable myocardium. Simultaneous assessment of regional LV function with the use of transthoracic tissue Doppler imaging and invasive collateral function has shown a statistically relevant association between systolic as well as diastolic LV function and collateral function in patients with CAD (Table).…”
Section: The Coronary Occlusion Model: Natural Versus Artificialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of LV functional recovery with its beneficial effect on survival provides the rationale for the technically demanding attempt to recanalize a CTO. 35 The recovery of impaired systolic LV function after revascularization of a CTO appears not to depend on the quality of collateral function, 36 suggesting that collateral development does not depend on the presence of viable myocardium. Simultaneous assessment of regional LV function with the use of transthoracic tissue Doppler imaging and invasive collateral function has shown a statistically relevant association between systolic as well as diastolic LV function and collateral function in patients with CAD (Table).…”
Section: The Coronary Occlusion Model: Natural Versus Artificialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left ventricular systolic function has been demonstrated to improve after CTO PCI in patients with baseline LV dysfunction, [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] while no change in ejection fraction can be expected when the baseline LV function is normal. 42 Left ventricular function improvement is dependent on the maintenance of CTO target vessel patency 37,38 and on the viability of the perfused myocardial territory, 39,40 …”
Section: Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Left ventricular function improvement is dependent on the maintenance of CTO target vessel patency 37,38 and on the viability of the perfused myocardial territory, 39,40 …”
Section: Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a substantial number of patients with CTO reveal various degrees of systolic LV dysfunction. The recovery of impaired systolic LV function after revascularization of a CTO seems not to depend on the quality of collateral function, 23 suggesting that collateral development does not depend on the presence of viable myocardium. In patients with CAD without CTO and viable myocardium, simultaneous assessment of regional LV function using transthoracic tissue Doppler imaging and invasive collateral function has shown an association between systolic as well as diastolic LV function and collateral function 24 (Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%