2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collapse analysis of slender masonry barrel vaults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evaluated as the ratio between the actual axial load, P and the axial capacity, Pu. Experimental tests performed on masonry structures [7,24] have shown that the axial load is much lower than the axial capacity of masonry. For this reason, the maximum value of the axial load has been fixed at the 30% of the maximum value.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is evaluated as the ratio between the actual axial load, P and the axial capacity, Pu. Experimental tests performed on masonry structures [7,24] have shown that the axial load is much lower than the axial capacity of masonry. For this reason, the maximum value of the axial load has been fixed at the 30% of the maximum value.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the analysis of masonry buildings, also the nonlinear behavior must be assessed [22]. However, this threshold is very low so that in many applications, zero tensile strength is assumed [23,24].The tensile strength is usually lower than 10% of the compressive strength as experimentally observed [25]. Furthermore, many experimental tests [24] have shown the collapse of masonry structure to occur at very low axial load levels compared to the axial capacity.…”
Section: Mechanical Model Of Masonrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aspect of theoretical model establishment, existing research into the mechanics of various materials and structural mechanics have been mainly used as references, and an improved theory of mechanics or models have also been adopted as research support [1][2][3][4][5], the simulation analysis tools mainly used are finite element analysis (FEA) software such as ANSYS [6][7][8][9][10], 3Muri [11][12][13], ABAQUS [14,15], SATATS [16], BrickWORK [17], TREMURI [18], etc. ; from the aspect of experimental testing, earthquake response characteristics have usually been obtained by the shaking table test [19] and ambient vibration tests [20][21][22], the intensity index is mainly detected by the triaxial compression test [23]; from the aspect of data monitoring, data obtained by monitoring tend to be used for structural safety assessments and structural strength improvement [24][25][26][27]; at the time of studying earthquake damage mechanisms, there have been macroscopic assessments for architectural heritage for some materials or structures [28][29][30][31][32], and in-depth assessments on architectural heritage monomers [33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heyman's work gave rise to numerous subsequent studies that assessed the main aspects affecting the structural response of masonry arches. In particular, recent studies have focused attention on the dynamic [2][3][4][5][6] and seismic behaviour [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] of existing masonry arch structures. One structural problem that has been rather neglected [21][22][23][24] in recent studies involves the behaviour of arches as a result of imposed settlement to the supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%