2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative management of business metadata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The information structure consists of element or attribute values that are referred to the description of the data, such as attribute value about data owner, data format, and so forth. The main aim of metadata schema development is to ease in understanding, organizing and storing the data [15], [16]. White (2005) [15] identifies four categories of metadata: structural metadata, content metadata, descriptive metadata and administrative metadata.…”
Section: A Metadata Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information structure consists of element or attribute values that are referred to the description of the data, such as attribute value about data owner, data format, and so forth. The main aim of metadata schema development is to ease in understanding, organizing and storing the data [15], [16]. White (2005) [15] identifies four categories of metadata: structural metadata, content metadata, descriptive metadata and administrative metadata.…”
Section: A Metadata Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to facilitate understandability of information services by different parties, metadata governance necessitates forming a collaborative repository of metadata used by different parties. 85,86 An information service that is provided by a party to be used within a networked business process by another party (see Figure 3), should be referred to its related metadata in a collaborative metadata repository. Change of information service provenance that is triggered by dynamic partnering troubles the availability of a relevant metadata in a formed collaborative metadata repository.…”
Section: Metadata Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change of information service provenance that is triggered by dynamic partnering troubles the availability of a relevant metadata in a formed collaborative metadata repository. 86 It also troubles the traceability of metadata related to a provided information service. 87 A metadata governor, which is responsible to align semantics used in different information services by different parties, also needs to evolve collaborative metadata to keep it aligned with the semantics of new information services (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Metadata Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apibrėžti veiklos objektus, jų sąveiką (Hüner et al, 2011) Įmonių keitimasis duomenimis su kitomis įmonėmis, valstybinėmis institucijomis bei vidaus ataskaitos ir planavimas reikalauja išsamių, laiku, aiškiai ir suprantamai nusakytų veiklos objektų (pvz., medžiagų, klientų, darbuotojų, tiekėjų), uždavinių. Metaduomenys turi apimti tiek srities ypatumus, tiek standartizuoti vidaus duomenų struktūras ir formatą.…”
Section: Duomenų Naujinimui (Apsikeitimui) (богданов Ir куликов 2007)unclassified