2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative approaches to public sector innovation: A scoping study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Guided by previous literature, we categorized user groups in public health and social care into two main types: end-and intermediate users (Von Hippel, 2009;Szkuta et al, 2014). End-users referred to those who use innovation directly (Von Hippel, 2009).…”
Section: Categorization Of Users and Their Roles In Udimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by previous literature, we categorized user groups in public health and social care into two main types: end-and intermediate users (Von Hippel, 2009;Szkuta et al, 2014). End-users referred to those who use innovation directly (Von Hippel, 2009).…”
Section: Categorization Of Users and Their Roles In Udimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing use of the internet in every area of life, the interaction of the government with other departments or institutions, with businesses and with citizens needs to adapt to this environment. Szkuta et al (2014) and other authors criticise that most e-government services are still not user-centred enough. Moreover they argue that in times of crisis, governments are more reluctant to investing in e-government projects.…”
Section: Classification Of E-government Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processes of interaction, sharing and collaboration intrinsic to the concept of web 2.0 guide the design of new participatory architectures [1]. Given the complex social, cultural, political and economic challenges inherent to the public governance processes, it is observed that the emergence of networks and relationships are reiterated by concepts like network society, network state [12], governance networks [10], government information networks [7], etc.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is related to the optimization of the processes that generate public value. According to Szkuta, Pizzicannella and Osimo [1] (p. 560), the collaborative relationships between government and society have been "defined in several overlapping ways and terms" such as: government 2.0 [2], open government, public services 2.0 [3], government as a platform [4], wiki government [5], networked government [6], etc. These initiatives converge on the essentiality of dialogical relations between state (public) and non-state (private) actors, which compose the "Government Information Networks" [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%