Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '96 1996
DOI: 10.1145/240080.240190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaboration in performance of physical tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series of prior studies (Fussell et al, 2000;Fussell, Setlock, & Kraut, 2003;Kraut et al, 2003;Kraut, Gergle, & Fussell, 2002;Kraut, Miller, & Siegel, 1996; see also Bolt, 1980;Emmorey & Casey, 2001), we have found that conversational grounding during collaborative physical tasks tends to follow a predictable pattern: First, collaborators come to mutual agreement upon or "ground" the objects to be manipulated using one or more referential expressions. Next, they provide instructions for procedures to be performed on those objects.…”
Section: Conversational Grounding In Collaborative Physical Tasksmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a series of prior studies (Fussell et al, 2000;Fussell, Setlock, & Kraut, 2003;Kraut et al, 2003;Kraut, Gergle, & Fussell, 2002;Kraut, Miller, & Siegel, 1996; see also Bolt, 1980;Emmorey & Casey, 2001), we have found that conversational grounding during collaborative physical tasks tends to follow a predictable pattern: First, collaborators come to mutual agreement upon or "ground" the objects to be manipulated using one or more referential expressions. Next, they provide instructions for procedures to be performed on those objects.…”
Section: Conversational Grounding In Collaborative Physical Tasksmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Our research suggests that grounding sequences are more efficient when people are co-located as opposed to when they are linked by audio or video technologies, even when those video technologies provide views of the workspace (Fussell et al, 2000;Fussell, Setlock & Kraut, 2003;Kraut et al, 1996;Kraut, et al, 2003). We hypothesized that, in part, this greater efficiency of co-located partners stems from their ability to make full use of both pointing and representational gestures to ground their conversations.…”
Section: Conversational Grounding In Collaborative Physical Tasksmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In practice, however, the majority of mobile computing systems neglect the nuances between personal and public information exchange. [4,5]. While sharing does occur, there is no permanent transfer of information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in [12] and in [13], two systems dedicated to repairing a physical object, the user is next to the object while an expert is at distant position. The real environment of the user is augmented by information provided by the expert.…”
Section: Augmented Reality and Groupwarementioning
confidence: 99%