Collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing facilities management standards and guidelines

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing standards and guidelines for Facilities Management (FM). Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on a longitudinal case study on research on FM value adding and its impact on FM standardization and development of a FM Value Guide. The sources used are literature and documents on FM value adding and standardization, published and planned FM standards, the FM Value Guide, internal documents and participant observations and experiences. All authors of this paper have both research and practical background. Two of them have been – and one still is – actively involved in developing European and international FM standards, and all three have been involved in developing the FM Value Guide. The research methodology can be characterized as retrospective action research. Findings The literature review shows that even though there are many references to standards in research papers, particularly in relation to definitions of concepts, there are only few studies on how research influences standardization and how researchers collaborate with practitioners on developing standards and guidelines. This paper presents a case study showing how research can contribute to standardization and development of guidelines in collaboration with practitioners and makes suggestions on how such collaboration can be improved. Practical implications The results of this paper provide understanding and inspiration for how researchers and practitioners can collaborate in the development of standards and guidelines. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first study on collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing FM standards and guidelines.

Establishing a new housing cooperative sustainable accounting standard as a tool for increasing the sustainable refurbishment practices

“…It also includes the presentation of goals and sustainability topics, see Figure 11. In addition, the SAS tool shows the contribution to standardization and developing guidelines in collaboration with practitioners [28,29].…”

Maintenance and Climate Impact – A Study of the Practice for Private Rented Out Housing Estates

“…Jensen [5,18] defines three maintenance methods: corrective maintenance, preventive maintenance, and replacement. Corrective maintenance remedies acute damage or failure.…”

Guest editorial: Role of research for standards within the built environment

“…As such, Asworth et al ’s (2022) work serves as introduction to BIM and as guidance for those unfamiliar with the concepts of organisation IR, asset IR (AIR) and project IR. The article by Jensen et al (2023) represents a retrospective perspective on own participation in developing formal FM standards – both at a European and a global level – concurrently as they are researchers. Their aim is to increase the understanding of how researchers and practitioners collaborate with regard to the development of formal standards and some of the challenges involved.…”