1989
DOI: 10.1002/tox.2540040309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coliphage association with coliform indicators: A case study—Brazil

Abstract: Many microbiological tests are currently available for evaluating the suitability of water resources for human use. Cost, speed, simplicity, and the ability of the test to detect microbial contamination are some of the key factors involved in selecting the appropriate test. The performance of the test often depends on the nature of the tested water and hence it is necessary to evaluate the test under local conditions. This paper compares the performance of several microbiological tests on Brazilian waters. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of H2S test in detecting indicator bacteria was comparable with the standard MPN test. These results support findings of other studies, which showed a close relation between the conventional methods to recover coliform bacteria and recovery of hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria using the H2S test from the same water samples (Manja et al, 1982;Martins et al, 1989;Ratto et al, 1989;Dutka and El-Shaarawi, 1990; Kromoredjo and Fujioka 1991;Martins et al, 1991). The test is reliable, easy to perform, and economic.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The efficiency of H2S test in detecting indicator bacteria was comparable with the standard MPN test. These results support findings of other studies, which showed a close relation between the conventional methods to recover coliform bacteria and recovery of hydrogen sulfide producing bacteria using the H2S test from the same water samples (Manja et al, 1982;Martins et al, 1989;Ratto et al, 1989;Dutka and El-Shaarawi, 1990; Kromoredjo and Fujioka 1991;Martins et al, 1991). The test is reliable, easy to perform, and economic.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The different amount of suspended particulates may account for these differences. The performance of the coliphage test often depends on the nature of the tested water under local conditions (Martins et al, 1989). This therefore suggested that the numbers of coliphages and coliforms changed under different environmental conditions and hence correlationships developed for one phase in a cycle or a system would differ from another.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, somatic coliphage became the most widely used due to its simple, inexpensive, and rapid methodology. The presence of somatic coliphages was associated with the intensity of fecal contamination in freshwater, lake, seawater, bathing water, sewage-polluted water, raw sewage, sewage sludge, reclaimed water, and drinking water (8,18,19,20,23,24,29,30,31). Somatic coliphages infecting Escherichia coli, via the cell wall, belong to four families: three-tailed phages (order Caudovirales) having double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genomes, including Myoviridae (long contractile tails), Siphoviridae (long noncontractile tails), and Podoviridae (short contractile tails), and one nontailed member of the Microviridae, as singlestranded DNA (ssDNA) phages (5,6,20,45).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%