2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11232-005-0187-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomology of the Poisson Superalgebra on Spaces of Superdimension (2, n −)

Abstract: Under certain assumptions about the continuity of cochains, we study the cohomology spaces of a Poisson superalgebra realized on the space of smooth Grassmann-valued functions with compact support in R 2 . We find the zeroth, first, and second cohomology spaces in the adjoint representation in the case of a constant nondegenerate Poisson superbracket.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then Eq. (A4.4) reduces to The expression for d ad 2T 3 (x|f, g, h) was calculated in [4]: d ad 2T 3 (x|f, g, h) = {h(x), V 2 (x)Θ(x|∂ 2 f g − f ∂ 2 g)} + E x h(x)a({f, g}) + +∂ 2 h(x)Θ(x|V 1 {f, g}) + {h(x),ν(x|{f, g})}.…”
Section: This Implies Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Then Eq. (A4.4) reduces to The expression for d ad 2T 3 (x|f, g, h) was calculated in [4]: d ad 2T 3 (x|f, g, h) = {h(x), V 2 (x)Θ(x|∂ 2 f g − f ∂ 2 g)} + E x h(x)a({f, g}) + +∂ 2 h(x)Θ(x|V 1 {f, g}) + {h(x),ν(x|{f, g})}.…”
Section: This Implies Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I 1 (p, q, r) = ([p, q + r] 3 + [p + r, q] 3 − [p, q] 3 )r 4 r 3 + [p, q] 3 (p + q) 4 (p + q) 3 + cycle(p, q, r), I 2 (p, q, r) = −6r 4 r 3 [p, q] 2 [p, q] x + cycle(p, q, r), I 3 (p, q, r) = 2r 4 r 3 {6[p, q](p 2 q 1 q 2 + p 1 p 2 q 2 )r 1 − 3[p, q](p 2 q 2 1 + p 2 1 q 2 )r 2 + +(p 3 2 q 1 − p 1 q 3 2 + 3p 2 q 1 q 2 2 − 3p 1 p 2 2 q 2 )r 2 1 + 3(p 2 1 p 2 q 2 − p 2 q 2 1 q 2 )r 1 r 2 + +(p 2 q 3 1 − p 3 1 q 2 )r 2 2 } + cycle(p, q, r), I 4 (p, q, r) = (p 4 + q 4 )(p 3 + q 3 )[(q 3 1 q 2 2 − p 3 1 p 2 2 + 3p 1 q 2 1 q 2 2 − 3p 2 1 p 2 2 q 1 + +p 3 1 p 2 q 2 − p 2 q 3 1 q 2 + 3p 2 1 q 1 q 2 2 − 3p 1 p 2 2 q 2 1 + 3p 2 1 p 2 q 1 q 2 − 3p 1 p 2 q 2 1 q 2 + +p 2 2 q 3 1 − p 3 1 q 2 2 )r 2 + (p 1 + q 1 ) 2 (p 3 2 − q 3 2 )r 1 ] + cycle(p, q, r), I 5 (p, q, r) = (p 4 + q 4 )(p 3 + q 3 )[(p 1 + q 1 ) 2 (q 1 − p 1 )r 3 2 + +3(p 1 + q 1 ) 2 (p 2 − q 2 )r 1 r 2 2 + 3(p 1 + q 1 )(q 2 2 − p 2 2 )r 2 1 r 2 + +(p 2 + q 2 )(p 2 2 − q 2 2 )r 3 1 ] + cycle(p, q, r), I 6 (p, q, r) = −(p 4 + q 4 + r 4 )(p 3 + q 3 + r 3 )[p, q] 3 + cycle(p, q, r), I 7 (p, q, r) = (p 4 + q 4 + r 4 )(p 3 + q 3 + r 3 )(p 1 + q 1 + r 1 ) 2 {[p, q](3(p 2 + q 2 )r 2 − −(p 2 + q 2 + r 2 ) 2 )} + cycle(p, q, r), I 8 (p, q, r) = (p 4 + q 4 + r 4 )(p 3 + q 3 + r 3 ){(4p 2 q 2 r 2 1 − 2(p 2 + q 2 )r 2 1 r 2 + +4(p 1 + q 1 )r 1 r 2 2 + 2r 2 1 r 2 2 )[p, q] + +(2(p 2 2 + q 2 2 )r 2 1 + 4p 1 q 1 r 2 2 − (2p 1 p 2 + 4p 1 q 2 + +4p 2 q 1 + 2q 1 q 2 )r 1 r 2 )[p, q] ξ } + cycle(p, q, r).…”
Section: The Proof Of Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations