2011
DOI: 10.1215/00127094-1345662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomological equations and invariant distributions for minimal circle diffeomorphisms

Abstract: Given any smooth circle diffeomorphism with irrational rotation number, we show that its invariant probability measure is the only invariant distribution (up to multiplication by a real constant). As a consequence of this, we show that the space of real C ∞ -coboundaries of such a diffeomorphism is closed in C ∞ (T) if and only if its rotation number is Diophantine.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we apply the results of [3] to study smooth kinematic expansive suspensions of irrational rotations. THEOREM 4.11.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we apply the results of [3] to study smooth kinematic expansive suspensions of irrational rotations. THEOREM 4.11.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there is δ > 0 such that if 0 < dist(x, y) < δ, then T (x) = T (y); and (3) l is homeomorphic to a subset of R.Proof. (1 → 2) The return time map T making the suspension of the identity map of l kinematic expansive, has to be locally injective by Proposition 4.1(3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem A allows to show an improved version of the Denjoy-Koksma inequality for C 1 test functions, thus extending Corollary C of [1] (valid for diffeomorphisms of class C 11 ) to C 1+bv diffeomorphisms. We omit the proof since it follows the very same lines of that of [1]. Indeed, the only new tool needed in [1] was the absence of invariant 1-distributions other than the invariant measure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We omit the proof since it follows the very same lines of that of [1]. Indeed, the only new tool needed in [1] was the absence of invariant 1-distributions other than the invariant measure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ergodic translations on tori are the archetypical examples of DUE diffeomorphisms. Recently, the first and third authors showed in [AK11] that every smooth circle diffeomorphism with irrational rotation number is also DUE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%