2015
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1421415561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On manifolds supporting distributionally uniquely ergodic diffeomorphisms

Abstract: A smooth diffeomorphism is said to be distributionally uniquely ergodic (DUE for short) when it is uniquely ergodic and its unique invariant probability measure is the only invariant distribution (up to multiplication by a constant). Ergodic translations on tori are classical examples of DUE diffeomorphisms. In this article we construct DUE diffeomorphisms supported on closed manifolds different from tori, providing some counterexamples to a conjecture proposed by Forni in [For08].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the Anosov-Katok construction in producing realizations of exotic dynamics makes it a good candidate for producing counter-examples to the conjecture. To our best knowledge, there have been two recent such attempts, both of them in spaces of quasi-periodic skew-product diffeomorphism spaces, [AFK15] and [Kar14]. Both attempts fail for slightly different reasons, but in the present article we will establish the reason why such attempts should not be expected to produce counter-examples to the conjecture.…”
Section: Introduction 1generalities and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The efficiency of the Anosov-Katok construction in producing realizations of exotic dynamics makes it a good candidate for producing counter-examples to the conjecture. To our best knowledge, there have been two recent such attempts, both of them in spaces of quasi-periodic skew-product diffeomorphism spaces, [AFK15] and [Kar14]. Both attempts fail for slightly different reasons, but in the present article we will establish the reason why such attempts should not be expected to produce counter-examples to the conjecture.…”
Section: Introduction 1generalities and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Remark 4. Group actions whose distributional kernel contains only an ergodic invariant probability measure are labelled distributionally uniquely ergodic (DUE) in [2], where diffeomorphisms with this property were obtained on manifolds different than tori. This indicates that DUE condition is significantly weaker than GH.…”
Section: Direct Consequence Of Proposition 21 Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fix a finite measurable set E ⊂ Z. For each z ∈ E, let f z = h, where h ∈ C ∞ c (R) with support inside the interval [1,2] satisfying…”
Section: Sl(2 R) × Sl(2 R)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, and certainly non-exhaustive, literature in the subject includes the works of Chavaudret [Cha11,Cha12,Cha13], also in collaboration with St. Marmi [CM12] and with Stolovich [CS] HP13], Zhou [YZ13], and the paper of Avila-FayadKocsard [AFK12], which triggered this finer study that we took up in our recent papers.…”
Section: Given Any Two Cocycles (αmentioning
confidence: 99%