2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.113004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COHERENT constraints after the COHERENT-2020 quenching factor measurement

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The description of these parameterisations can be found in several papers, for example in refs. [3,13,14,18,30]. For the proton rms radii, in our calculations we use [32,33] R p (Cs) = 4.804 fm, R p (I) = 4.749 fm, R p (Ar) = 3.448 fm.…”
Section: Ceνns Signal Prediction In the Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The description of these parameterisations can be found in several papers, for example in refs. [3,13,14,18,30]. For the proton rms radii, in our calculations we use [32,33] R p (Cs) = 4.804 fm, R p (I) = 4.749 fm, R p (Ar) = 3.448 fm.…”
Section: Ceνns Signal Prediction In the Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the neutron rms radius is only poorly known experimentally both in CsI [3,4,10,13,14,16,34] and Ar [18]. For CsI, we adopt the values R n (Cs) = 5.01 fm and R n (I) = 4.94 fm obtained with the relativistic mean field (RMF) NL-Z2 [35] nuclear model calculation in ref.…”
Section: Ceνns Signal Prediction In the Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations