2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10746-007-9050-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Theory and Phenomenology in Arendt’s and Nussbaum’s Work on Narrative

Abstract: In this essay I compare Nussbaum's and Arendt's approach to narrativity. The point of the comparison is to find out which approach is more adequate for practical philosophy: the approach influenced by cognitive theory (Nussbaum) or the one influenced by hermeneutic phenomenology (Arendt). I conclude that Nussbaum's approach is flawed by methodological solipsism, which is due to her application of cognitive theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then Vollrath and Fantel (1977) stated that Arendt was a political thinker with a unique position with original political thought and could not be compared to anyone. The narrative approach in Arendt's version of storytelling, according to Vasterling (2007), is always related to hermeneutical philosophical or behavioral phenomenology methods. Santos (2011) considers Arendt's conception of political theory as storytelling rather than seeking consensus but looking for an audience link in critical thinking about the issue by reviewing a different perspective.…”
Section: Storytelling As Political Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then Vollrath and Fantel (1977) stated that Arendt was a political thinker with a unique position with original political thought and could not be compared to anyone. The narrative approach in Arendt's version of storytelling, according to Vasterling (2007), is always related to hermeneutical philosophical or behavioral phenomenology methods. Santos (2011) considers Arendt's conception of political theory as storytelling rather than seeking consensus but looking for an audience link in critical thinking about the issue by reviewing a different perspective.…”
Section: Storytelling As Political Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vasterling has accused Nussbaum of "methodological solipsism", arguing that the act of readingsolitary as it is -cannot have such moral significance as Nussbaum ascribes to it. Encounters with real people are very much different to encounters with literary characters and the latter cannot serve as "the matrix" for the former [61]. Eaglestone, in turn, criticized Nussbaum's naïve representational understanding of literature.…”
Section: Confronting Possible Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a plurality of views can help to keep the social fabric vital and vigorous [58], a diversity of stories concerning the same web of relationships, facts and events, will make this web more solid, more objective and more real [62].…”
Section: Dilemmas In Dealing With Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are ready for immersing themselves in the constructed stories and for connecting the uncertain future of nanotechnologies back to daily observed sociotechnical effects of established technologies. According to Martha Nussbaum [62] narratives may help ordinary people to focus on the complexities and ambiguities of human affairs and to reflect on emotional experience of real life moral dilemmas. This affords citizens insight into deeply held convictions and values, thereby offering them the chance to judge and clarify one's worldview and goals in life.…”
Section: Nanosoc As An Experimental Model In Dealing With Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%