2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-013-0012-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive plasticity, cognitive functioning and quality of life (QoL) in a sample of young-old and old-old adults in southern Spain

Abstract: Differences in cognitive plasticity between young-old and old-old adults only appear when the cognitive functioning of individuals is taken into account, rather than their age group. The variables cognitive functioning, social integration and education level appear to be the best predictors of cognitive plasticity in old age.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, changes in body weight have an impact on the rate of bone loss in the sense that “skinny” women (BMI <18.5 kg/m 2 ) more rapidly lose bone mass than women with stable body weight (0.8% annually), while women whose body weight increased with the time does not losing bone mass significantly (0.1%) (11, 12). Obesity has for years been considered as a protective factor for the development of the skeleton and osteoporosis, but recent clinical studies indicate that obesity has a negative effect on the quality of the bone despite normal values of bone density measured by densitometry of what is considered to be the result of increased mechanical pressure on the bone (13, 14). A significant percentage of fractures exactly happens in obese women because of the body structure or mechanism of injury (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, changes in body weight have an impact on the rate of bone loss in the sense that “skinny” women (BMI <18.5 kg/m 2 ) more rapidly lose bone mass than women with stable body weight (0.8% annually), while women whose body weight increased with the time does not losing bone mass significantly (0.1%) (11, 12). Obesity has for years been considered as a protective factor for the development of the skeleton and osteoporosis, but recent clinical studies indicate that obesity has a negative effect on the quality of the bone despite normal values of bone density measured by densitometry of what is considered to be the result of increased mechanical pressure on the bone (13, 14). A significant percentage of fractures exactly happens in obese women because of the body structure or mechanism of injury (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the model of third versus fourth age (Baltes, 1998; Baltes & Smith, 2003) argues that aging in advanced age is not a continuous process, but that instead one needs to qualitatively differentiate between young-old and old-old age groups due to discontinuity in aging. Empirically, this conceptual distinction between young-old and old-old age groups has been adopted in many research areas including psychology, epidemiology, physiology, demography, and sociology (e.g., Abdel-Ghany & Sharpe, 1997; Adams et al, 2011; Alterovitz & Mendelsohn, 2013; Ansah et al, 2015; Bodner et al, 2013; Buch et al, 1999; Calero et al, 2013; Gavazzi et al, 2002; Kvavilashvili et al, 2013; Menec & Chipperfield, 1997; Vaupel et al, 1998; Wright & Holliday, 2007; Wu et al, 2015; Yoshimura et al, 2013; Zinke et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a sample selection, researchers have often to return to “practical” strategies such as splitting the available old age sample into two halves. Therefore, in most studies comparing young-old and old-old adults, the decision had to remain rather arbitrary and the old-old age group was stratified to be at least 75 years [7,16,17,18,19], 80 years [10,20,21,22,23,24], or 81 years [25,26], with the young-old age group being respectively below this age. Yet, in comparison to that, in some studies the old-old age group was relatively young, stratified to be at least 70 years [27] or 71 years [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we investigated the domains cognitive abilities (i.e., processing speed and verbal abilities as markers for fluid and crystallized intelligence), general health status, activity participation, and life satisfaction as they concern important aspects of everyday functioning in old age [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,22,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. For processing speed, verbal abilities, general health status, and activity participation, evidence typically shows a decline in old age, with sharp gradients in old-old age [1,2,3,10,30,31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%