1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02805972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive performance effects of subcutaneous nicotine in smokers and never-smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

18
179
4
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
18
179
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to experimental constraints, we limited the CPT task to 6 min, which was not sufficient time to observe a vigilance decrement. The performance improvement (fewer false alarms and faster response time) we observed when nicotine was administered after overnight tobacco deprivation is consistent with previous studies in which nicotine was administered transdermally (Bekker et al, 2005;Trimmel and Wittberger, 2004) or via subcutaneous injection (Foulds et al, 1996). In the nondeprived condition, we observed increased hits, decreased false alarms, and decreased variability of response time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to experimental constraints, we limited the CPT task to 6 min, which was not sufficient time to observe a vigilance decrement. The performance improvement (fewer false alarms and faster response time) we observed when nicotine was administered after overnight tobacco deprivation is consistent with previous studies in which nicotine was administered transdermally (Bekker et al, 2005;Trimmel and Wittberger, 2004) or via subcutaneous injection (Foulds et al, 1996). In the nondeprived condition, we observed increased hits, decreased false alarms, and decreased variability of response time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, the effect of nicotine on working memory and computational skills is less clear. Some studies reported enhanced working memory following nicotine administration to nonsmokers (Foulds et al, 1996;Kumari et al, 2003;McClernon et al, 2003) and former smokers and abstinent smokers (Ernst et al, 2001). In contrast, other studies reported that nicotine either had no effect (Heishman et al, 1993;Kleykamp et al, 2005;Myers et al, 2004) or impaired working memory (Park et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study which investigated the effect of a single dose of transdermal nicotine in nonsmokers, with attention as the primary outcome, described improvement in performance on the Conners' CPT as reflected by a reduction in hit reaction time variability and omission errors, however, no medication effect was seen on commission errors (Levin et al, 1998). Our results with a different CPT and a higher dose of nicotine, are consistent although not identical with these results and provide further evidence that nicotinic receptor stimulation leads to cognitive benefits in individuals without cognitive impairment (Le Houezec et al, 1994;Foulds et al, 1996;Levin et al, 1998;Mumenthaler et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Previous studies investigating the effects of nicotine on attention in nonsmokers without psychiatric disorder have yielded inconsistent findings (Heishman et al, 1993;Le Houezec et al, 1994;Foulds et al, 1996;Levin et al, 1998;Heishman and Henningfield, 2000;Ernst et al, 2001;Mumenthaler et al, 2003;Sacco et al, 2004). Although it has been suggested that individuals with optimal baseline performance may experience deterioration in performance with nAChR stimulation unless task demands are very high (Newhouse et al, 2004), variation in findings may also be attributed to differences in the measure used to assess attentional performance or, as above, to pharmacological differences such as dose or mode of administration of nicotine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have been discrepant, including improved performance in motor responses, sustained attention, and recognition memory, but no effect or impairment in selective attention, conditioned learning, and recall mem-ory. Similarly, few studies have examined the cognitive effects of a history of smoking; and again, the results have been inconsistent (Perkins et al 1990;Perkins et al 1994;Foulds et al 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%