2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1759078715001221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive null steering in frequency diverse array radars

Abstract: Null steering has been a challenge in radar communications for the past few decades. In this paper, a novel cognitive null steering technique in frequency diverse array radars using frequency offset selection is presented. The proposed system is a complete implementable framework that provides precise and deep null placement in the range and angle locations of the interference source. The proposed system is cognitive such that the transmitter and receiver are connected via a feedback loop. System extracts inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose the Eigen vectors of Ru are falsefalse{q1,q2qNfalsefalse}, then we define En=][qL+1thickmathspaceqL+2qN that represents the Eigen vectors except the ones corresponding to the L largest Eigen values. Therefore, the spatial spectra can then be represented by [27]Pmu)(θ=1bH)(θEnEnHbold-italicb)(θ=1bold-italicEnnormalHbθ2. The sources’ DOAs θ^k can be estimated from the spatial spectra peaks. Thereafter, the sources’ ranges r^k can be computed as [28]r^k=c2Tnormald1dλsin)(θfalse^k1Δf where Td and λ denote the total trip time and wavelength, respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Cognitive Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose the Eigen vectors of Ru are falsefalse{q1,q2qNfalsefalse}, then we define En=][qL+1thickmathspaceqL+2qN that represents the Eigen vectors except the ones corresponding to the L largest Eigen values. Therefore, the spatial spectra can then be represented by [27]Pmu)(θ=1bH)(θEnEnHbold-italicb)(θ=1bold-italicEnnormalHbθ2. The sources’ DOAs θ^k can be estimated from the spatial spectra peaks. Thereafter, the sources’ ranges r^k can be computed as [28]r^k=c2Tnormald1dλsin)(θfalse^k1Δf where Td and λ denote the total trip time and wavelength, respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Cognitive Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in [99], an FDA with a time‐dependent frequency offset was proposed to get improved beam pattern for a given range and direction. A null steering technique using suitable frequency offsets for an FDA radar has been presented in [100] for improved interference cancellation.…”
Section: Fda Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a frequency offset calculation method based on the receiver feedback was proposed in [98] to improve the transmit energy focusing performance in the target position. Moreover, cognitive null steering using a cognitive FDA was proposed in [100], to improve the interference suppression performance. A symmetric cognitive FDA radar design with non‐uniform frequency offsets along the array was proposed in [116], to generate a signal maximum sharp and wide beam pattern according to the requirement, received as feedback from receiver, for enhanced target detection, SINR and CRLB‐based estimation performance.…”
Section: Fda Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by that cognitive radar is a transmitter‐centric closed‐loop radar system, where it can real‐time exploit its environment to update current probabilistic understanding of the channel, cognitive FDA radar is proposed in [99, 100]. Since FDA creates a range‐dependent beampattern whose amplitude and spatial distribution can be controlled by the frequency increment, we can iteratively adjust the frequency increment in a closed‐loop way to control the transmitted energy distribution to suppress range–angle‐dependent interferences.…”
Section: Potential Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%