2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2023.103113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive load causes kinematic changes in both elite and non-elite rowers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest the exact opposite: in the course of learning, the importance of cognitive processes for performing actually increases. This refutes traditional automaticity frameworks [8,22] and confirms more recent findings from movement sciences [26,27]. Since the learning time was very On the other hand, the time-variant associations between response pad performance and cognito-motor skills, which plateaued around trial 15, were probably fully captured.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggest the exact opposite: in the course of learning, the importance of cognitive processes for performing actually increases. This refutes traditional automaticity frameworks [8,22] and confirms more recent findings from movement sciences [26,27]. Since the learning time was very On the other hand, the time-variant associations between response pad performance and cognito-motor skills, which plateaued around trial 15, were probably fully captured.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, manual gear shifting appears to be a controlled process well beyond the first year of driving a car [25]. Similar results were found for rowing, which requires cognitive monitoring not only for beginners but also for top athletes with more than 10 years of training [26,27]. Further, the execution of simple discrete finger sequences practiced several hundred times cannot be regarded as automatic [15].…”
Section: Cognitive Contributions Of Motor Sequence Learningmentioning
confidence: 58%