2011
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2011.24050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Linguistics–Inspired Empirical Study of Chinese EFL Teaching

Abstract: Aiming to verify how and why insightfulness of the CL-inspired approach can facilitate L2 or FL learners in the process of learning English as a second or a foreign language, an empirical study of Chinese EFL learners has been carried out in the authentic Chinese EFL classroom on the campus of Tianjin Foreign Studies University. After the classroom treatment, the EG outperformed the CG by 21.7% based on the results from the delayed posttest in Experiment 1; by 6.73% in Experiment 2; by 6.61% in Experiment 3; b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A continuación, se procedió a seleccionar los conceptos centrales que conforman el marco cognitivo (Fillmore, 1985) del periodo histórico estudiado. Dichos conceptos son cruciales en el tratamiento del periodo histórico y, por ende, no se puede prescindir de ellos en la enseñanza de esta unidad educativa.…”
Section: Selección De Los Conceptosunclassified
“…A continuación, se procedió a seleccionar los conceptos centrales que conforman el marco cognitivo (Fillmore, 1985) del periodo histórico estudiado. Dichos conceptos son cruciales en el tratamiento del periodo histórico y, por ende, no se puede prescindir de ellos en la enseñanza de esta unidad educativa.…”
Section: Selección De Los Conceptosunclassified
“…The theoretical contrivances from CL that have been applied to English teaching in the past studies are mainly divided into two groups, i.e., the conceptual metaphor group and the core meaning group. CL holds that metaphorization is a natural feature of language, and thus conceptual metaphor proposed by Lakoff and Johnson (1980) (e.g., HAPPY IS UP, SAD IS DOWN) or conceptual manipulations including metaphor or metonymy have been applied to explain the reasonableness of the collocation of words or the existence of some word formation (e.g., Azuma & Littlemore, 2010, Boers, 2000a, 2000bDeignan, Gabryś & Solska, 1997;Gao, 2011;Lazar, 1996;Yasuda, 2010;Zoltán & Szabó, 1996). The other group uses the core meaning or core schema 1) (e.g., Akamatsu, 2010aAkamatsu, , 2010bCho & Kawase, 2011, 2012Fujii, 2011Fujii, , 2016aFujii, , 2016bSato, 2015;Strong, 2013;Verspoor & Lowie, 2003;Wijaya, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the CL approach contains a cognitive view in its explanations and brings us a great deal of enlightment that is different from the traditional translation-based instruction (TBI), where learners memorize the meaning of words or phrases through translation in their mother language, generally in a piecemeal fashion. The research on CL approach has started to be accumulated both theoretically (e.g., Littlemore, 2009;Tanaka, Sato & Abe, 2006;Tyler, 2012) and empirically (e.g., Akamatsu, 2010aAkamatsu, , 2010bAzuma & Littlemore, 2010;Boers, 2000a;Cho & Kawase, 2011, 2012Fujii, 2011Fujii, , 2016aFujii, , 2016bGao, 2011;Imai, 2016;Morimoto & Loewen, 2007;Sato, 2015;Yasuda, 2010). These studies have shed light on its effectiveness and problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they failed to mention different learning effects of different vocabulary items (Sato, 2016a). The present study draws on cognitive linguistics (CL) as a rationale for the use of visual aids to facilitate L2 learning and has developed visual aids based on a CL framework Boers, Warren, Grimshaw & Siyanova-Chanturia, 2017;Gao, 2011). According to dual coding theory, which underpins CL-based pedagogies, the combination of verbal and visual input serves as a trigger to create mental imagery and improve understanding of word meanings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%