2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive image, affective image, cultural dimensions, and conative image: A new conceptual framework

Abstract: Destination image is essential to tourists' loyalty and has been discussed in length among researchers and marketers in the tourism industry for decades. Based on a literature review, the destination image model, including cognitive image, affective image, and conative image, has been firmly established as an acceptable means to gain an understanding of tourists' behavior toward revisiting and recommendations. The understanding of the moderating role of cultural constructs is still unclear, especially in cross… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(177 reference statements)
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The cognitive and affective dimensions have been used primarily in assessing the status of a destination’s image in the existing literature ( Stylidis, 2016 ; Stylidis et al, 2017a ), and it has been considered that these dimensions have strong explanatory power ( Stylidis et al, 2017b ; Wei, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ). “Cognitive image” denotes the impression potential tourists have of the various attributes of a destination, including its infrastructure, natural scenery, history, and culture ( Stylidis et al, 2017b ; Yang et al, 2022b ). “Affective image” refers to tourists’ subjective emotional response to their perception of a destination, which is often expressed by adjectives such as “interesting” or “spectacular” ( Marine-Roig and Ferrer-Rosell, 2018 ; Molinillo et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive and affective dimensions have been used primarily in assessing the status of a destination’s image in the existing literature ( Stylidis, 2016 ; Stylidis et al, 2017a ), and it has been considered that these dimensions have strong explanatory power ( Stylidis et al, 2017b ; Wei, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ). “Cognitive image” denotes the impression potential tourists have of the various attributes of a destination, including its infrastructure, natural scenery, history, and culture ( Stylidis et al, 2017b ; Yang et al, 2022b ). “Affective image” refers to tourists’ subjective emotional response to their perception of a destination, which is often expressed by adjectives such as “interesting” or “spectacular” ( Marine-Roig and Ferrer-Rosell, 2018 ; Molinillo et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty avoidance is interpreted as the degree to which society perceives itself to be intimidated by any uncertain and ambiguous situation and tries to avoid it. By adopting the cultural dimension approach of Hofstede, it can be seen that the loyalty of visitors across cultures may be predicted by individualism and uncertainty avoidance, and their behavior intention might be evaluated as a determination of tourism internationalization ( Yang et al, 2022b ).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 (3) : 2023 tourist differs significantly among different destinations and tourists' perceptions of a particular destination may involve unique evaluation in terms of content and context in addition to evaluation drawn from various contexts of association between destination image (Hu, Huang, Chen and Hua, 2022). Gartner (1994) constituted a hierarchical cause-andeffect framework for destination image formation that is comprised of three components: cognitive image, affective image, and conative image (Yang et al, 2022). Numerous researchers endorsed this framework, which was used to gain an understanding of tourists' behavioral intentions (Ghazali and Cai, 2013;Agapito et al, 2013;Kumar et al, 2020;Marine-Roig and Huertas, 2020;Lalicic et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Review Destination Imagementioning
confidence: 99%