2019
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Flexibility Training Improves Extinction Retention Memory and Enhances Cortical Dopamine With and Without Traumatic Stress Exposure

Abstract: Stress exposure can cause lasting changes in cognition, but certain individual traits, such as cognitive flexibility, have been shown to reduce the degree, duration, or severity of cognitive changes following stress. Both stress and cognitive flexibility training affect decision making by modulating monoamine signaling. Here, we test the role cognitive flexibility training, and high vs. low cognitive flexibility at the individual level, in attenuating stress-induced changes in memory and monoamine levels using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We promoted CT through learning and memory tasks in tandem. CT is a process associated with rearrangements of synaptic connectivity at brain sites specific to memory that occur as a result of dendritic spine changes in response to stimuli (Ammassari‐Teule, ); this process possibly increases cognitive flexibility, defined as the capacity to shift behavioral strategies in a changing environment (Chaby, Karavidha, Lisieski, Perrine, & Liberzon, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We promoted CT through learning and memory tasks in tandem. CT is a process associated with rearrangements of synaptic connectivity at brain sites specific to memory that occur as a result of dendritic spine changes in response to stimuli (Ammassari‐Teule, ); this process possibly increases cognitive flexibility, defined as the capacity to shift behavioral strategies in a changing environment (Chaby, Karavidha, Lisieski, Perrine, & Liberzon, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers can choose to manipulate these neural substrates at different timepoints in conjunction with stress or strategy shifting, or alternatively measure neural substrates after exposure to these behavioral paradigms. This modified operant strategy shifting task has clear advantages over other cognitive flexibility paradigms used in the stress literature (i.e., the digging task [12][13][14][15] ), which require more time and effort by the experimenter to train rodents. This procedure requires minimal oversight by the experimenter and allows multiple rats to be tested simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operant strategy shifting paradigm does have certain limitations. One limitation is that it can only test two stimulus dimensions (e.g., left or right lever vs. light cue), whereas the digging task [12][13][14][15] can test a third stimulus dimension (e.g., digging media vs. odor vs. texture). However, the task described in this protocol still allows for testing of the rat's ability to shift to different rules, which allows testing of the cognitive flexibility constructs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPS can induce an extinction retention deficit, in which fear is enhanced after a fear association has been extinguished, indicating the dominance of fear memory over extinction memory 44,65,67 . To test extinction retention, rats were trained on the 8th day following SPS to associate a tone with a shock across five shock-tone pairings in a fear conditioning chamber (day 1: fear conditioning; shock features: 1 s, 1 mA; tone: 10 s, 1 kHz, 80 dB, 60 s inter-trial-interval 65,69 ). Freezing responses were quantified as a proxy of fear 44,70 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the 9th day after SPS, rats were presented with the same tone 30 times without the shock to extinguish fear responses in a second context (day 2: fear extinction). The second context was differentiated by novel auditory, visual, tactile, and olfactory cues 65,69 . Finally, rats were returned to the extinction context on the 10th day after SPS and were re-exposed to the tone without the shock for 10 presentations (day 3: extinction retention).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%