1999
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive behavior modification of hyperactivity–impulsivity and aggression: A meta-analysis of school-based studies.

Abstract: Cognitive behavior modification (CBM) has been used for the past 25 years to mitigate maladaptive behaviors through the use of covert self-statements. Yet few reviewers have examined the use of CBM in school settings to reduce hyperactive-impulsive and aggressive behaviors in children and youth. This meta-analysis examined the outcomes of 23 studies. The mean effect size across all the studies was 0.74, and 89% of the studies had treatment participants who experienced greater gains than their control counterpa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean effect sizes were available from 33 syntheses and, with the exception of four, these were all statistically significant. The mean effects varied widely, that is, from an odds ratio (OR) of 1.08 (d = 0.04) in a meta-analysis of school programs (Wilson et al 2001) to an OR of 3.19 (d = 0.64) in a meta-analysis of child-focused programs (Robinson et al 1999). The average effect was significant for all four types of programs and the overall effect was OR = 1.46.…”
Section: Replication In Developmental Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean effect sizes were available from 33 syntheses and, with the exception of four, these were all statistically significant. The mean effects varied widely, that is, from an odds ratio (OR) of 1.08 (d = 0.04) in a meta-analysis of school programs (Wilson et al 2001) to an OR of 3.19 (d = 0.64) in a meta-analysis of child-focused programs (Robinson et al 1999). The average effect was significant for all four types of programs and the overall effect was OR = 1.46.…”
Section: Replication In Developmental Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying assumptions are that overt behavior is mediated by cognitive events and that people can learn to influence cognitive events to change their own behavior. Literature reviews and meta-analyses (Abikoff, 1991;Dush, Hirt, & Schroeder, 1989;Robinson et al, 1999;Smith, Lochman, & Daunic, 2005) have substantiated CBI's usefulness for the prevention and remediation of specific behavioral deficits and the maintenance of appropriate behavior for mainstream students. Teaching students cognitive strategies has been found to decrease hyperactivity/impulsivity and disruption/aggression, strengthen pro-social behavior, increase social cognition, and improve peer relations (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research-based approach to teaching students positive coping strategies (e.g., Kendall & Braswell, 1985;Lochman, Whidby, & FitzGerald, 2000;Robinson, Smith, Miller, & Brownell, 1999), CBIs incorporate behavior therapy techniques such as modeling, feedback, and reinforcement, and cognitive mediation techniques such as "think-alouds" to build what Kendall (1993) called a new coping template. The underlying assumptions are that overt behavior is mediated by cognitive events and that people can learn to influence cognitive events to change their own behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If coupled with data regarding prior aggression, measures of dispositional aggression could be useful for screening adolescents who might benefit from intervention aimed at reducing dispositional and behavioral aggression. School-or community-based interventions for aggression could include cognitive therapies (e.g., Cavell & Hughes, 2000;Larson, Calamari, West, & Frevert, 1998;Robinson, Smith, Miller, & Brownell, 1999), bibliotherapy (Shectman, 1999;, and/or martial arts training (Lamarre & Nosanchuk, 1999;Skelton, Glynn, & Berta, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%