Objective
We sought to replicate a previously published prediction model for progression, developed in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study (CCDPS), using a clinical cohort from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center.
Methods
We included 1120 incident AD cases with at least one assessment after diagnosis, originating from 31 Alzheimer Disease centers from the United States. Trajectories of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-sb) were modeled jointly over time using parallel-process growth mixture models in order to identify latent classes of trajectories. Bias-corrected multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors of class membership and compare these with the predictors found in the CCDPS.
Results
The best fitting model contained three classes; class 1 was the largest (63%) and showed the slowest progression on both MMSE and CDR-sb. Classes 2 (22%) and 3 (15%) showed moderate and rapid worsening, respectively. Significant predictors of membership in classes 2 and 3, relative to class 1, were worse baseline MMSE and CDR-sb, higher education and lack of hypertension. Combining all previously mentioned predictors yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.70 and 0.75 for classes 2 and 3, relative to class 1.
Conclusions
Our replication study confirmed that it is possible to predict trajectories of progression in AD with relatively good accuracy. The class distribution was comparable with the original study, with most individuals being members of a class with stable or slow progression. This is important for informing newly diagnosed AD patients and their caregivers.