“…This theory was applied to MC with the assumption that these “sexually dimorphic” cognitive abilities/skills would differ across MC [ 115 ]. It was therefore expected that women would perform better on visuospatial tasks during phases with low E2 and PG levels and that, in contrast, performance on verbal tasks would be improved during LaF and MiL; in view of recent critical reviews, evidence is nevertheless insufficient to support the sexually dimorphic hypothesis [ 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 ]. Indeed, regarding visuospatial ability, only a few studies on mental rotation, the most commonly used test [ 120 ], have supported the hypothesis of superior performance in EaF [ 121 , 122 , 123 ], whereas the others showed no significant findings [ 124 , 125 , 126 ].…”