Coffee Wilt Disease 2010
DOI: 10.1079/9781845936419.0050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coffee wilt disease in Ethiopia.

Abstract: This chapter reviews the status of coffee wilt disease (caused by Gibberella xylarioides), including its occurrence, distribution and importance on arabica coffee in Ethiopia, and highlights some of the factors accelerating the disease and efforts made to contain the problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has continued to spread throughout all coffee-growing districts in Uganda and into Tanzania and continues to be a problem of C. arabica in Ethiopia (Girma et al 2009). It has been estimated that the disease has cost $1 billion so far in terms of lost production and cost of management practices (Phiri and Baker 2009).…”
Section: Coffee Wilt Disease (Cwd)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has continued to spread throughout all coffee-growing districts in Uganda and into Tanzania and continues to be a problem of C. arabica in Ethiopia (Girma et al 2009). It has been estimated that the disease has cost $1 billion so far in terms of lost production and cost of management practices (Phiri and Baker 2009).…”
Section: Coffee Wilt Disease (Cwd)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, this disease is not just a threat to African coffee production, as coffee from other producing countries has been shown to be susceptible (Girma et al 2009). The disease is a threat to coffee production globally and coffee producers worldwide should be made more aware of it.…”
Section: Coffee Wilt Disease (Cwd)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The robusta strains share a significantly higher proportion of orthologous gene sets with Coffea659 (SuperExactTest, p¡0.001), and they generally display more concordance with the Coffea strains, while the arabica strains have the most unique orthogroups. The arabica strains share slightly more genes with the ex-type strain Coffea674 than with Coffea659 despite the latter being the only strain able to infect both both arabica and robusta coffee (Girma et al 2009, Flood 2005.…”
Section: The Arabica Population Arose Independently From the Robusta mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four genes highlighted as absent in robusta strains are cases of sharing between Coffea and arabica strains. Of these, six7 is shared with Coffea659, the only Coffea strain that is also able to infect arabica coffee (Girma et al 2009, Flood 2005, and therefore of possible interest as pathogenicity factors for growth on arabica coffee. Just one gene, OG0014797, is shared by robusta and arabica populations but absent in both Coffea strains.…”
Section: Host-specific Populations Differ In Their Complement Of Putamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inconsistent response of Harenna coffee populations in the field and the greenhouse conditions could perhaps be the difference in Aggressiveness of the pathogen isolates used in the seedling inoculation tests, as they were originated from southwest Ethiopia. This in turn warrants studying host pathogen interactions among coffee accessions and the pathogen strains representing forest coffee systems, as variations in aggressiveness among the pathogen populations was already reported by a number of workers (Adugna et al, 2005;Girma et al, 2009b;Rutherford et al, 2009).…”
Section: Seedling Inoculation Tests Of Forest Coffee Accessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%