1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.360611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coercivity of magnetic domain wall motion near the edge of a terrace

Abstract: Domain wall motion near the edges of terraces (e.g., grooves, pits, plateaus, etc.) is studied using analytical techniques based on the minimum energy principle and computer simulations based on the dynamic Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation. One-dimensional lattices of magnetic dipoles with variations either of the easy axis direction (corresponding to a tilt of the anisotropy axis at the edge) or of the nearest-neighbor exchange force (corresponding to a changing film thickness) are considered. We show that th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute the increased coercivity to increased domain wall pinning due to the presence of a higher defect density in the form of peaks and pits, on the scale of tens and hundreds of nanometers in width and height as seen on the AFM scan in Figure d. These defects can act to pin or trap domain walls due to local changes in anisotropy or film thickness . This is further evidenced by the domain imaging of a 0.8 nm CoFeB layer on the polyimide substrate in Figure b where we observe significant domain wall pinning and a larger number of nucleation sites than Figure a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We attribute the increased coercivity to increased domain wall pinning due to the presence of a higher defect density in the form of peaks and pits, on the scale of tens and hundreds of nanometers in width and height as seen on the AFM scan in Figure d. These defects can act to pin or trap domain walls due to local changes in anisotropy or film thickness . This is further evidenced by the domain imaging of a 0.8 nm CoFeB layer on the polyimide substrate in Figure b where we observe significant domain wall pinning and a larger number of nucleation sites than Figure a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In Co/Pt MLs the anisotropy is strongly related to the Co layer thickness [37]. It is reasonable to assume that the magnetic anisotropy is different in the perimeter region due to the reduced thickness, which may also help to pin the domain walls at this region [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study sputtered a thin Co/Pt film on an AAO template to produce magnetic anti-dot arrays with a pore size range between 7 and 46 nm (Figure 6c), of which the 30 nm (Figure 6d) anti-dot array exhibited the highest out-of-plane coercive field H c = 1350 Oe and out-of-plane magnetic hysteresis loop squareness ratio S [82]. Continuous films only exhibited a coercive field of 140 Oe with negligible squareness (Figure 6d, green line), while porous films with larger pore sizes displayed sharp reductions in H c (Figure 6d, red line) due to high anisotropy in the vicinity of the pore rim [91]. The enhanced coercivity is attributed to the anti-dot array serving as non-magnetic defects, which effectively results in stronger domain-wall pinning with increasing pore size [92].…”
Section: Functional Reverse Templatementioning
confidence: 99%