1976
DOI: 10.1093/jee/69.5.597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Codling Moth: Suppression by Male Removal with Sex Pheromone Traps in an Isolated Apple Orchard12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the percentage of reductions (control efÞciency) of infestation at different test sites for each generation, the College Road site had the largest reduction, followed by the Zhichun Road and the North Shuangyushu Road sites (Table 4), an order the reverse of the initial population density (Table 1). These results are consistent with those of Madsen et al (1976) in Okanagan Mission, British Columbia, where pheromone traps were installed at a density of Ϸ10/ha for controlling the codling moth, C. pomonella (L.) by male removal in an isolated, 2-ha apple orchard for 3 yr. The percentage of codling moth injured fruit was reduced to 0.03, 0.53, and 0.06%, respectively, during the 3-yr tests.…”
Section: Infestation Of Petioles and Seed Podssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When comparing the percentage of reductions (control efÞciency) of infestation at different test sites for each generation, the College Road site had the largest reduction, followed by the Zhichun Road and the North Shuangyushu Road sites (Table 4), an order the reverse of the initial population density (Table 1). These results are consistent with those of Madsen et al (1976) in Okanagan Mission, British Columbia, where pheromone traps were installed at a density of Ϸ10/ha for controlling the codling moth, C. pomonella (L.) by male removal in an isolated, 2-ha apple orchard for 3 yr. The percentage of codling moth injured fruit was reduced to 0.03, 0.53, and 0.06%, respectively, during the 3-yr tests.…”
Section: Infestation Of Petioles and Seed Podssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The rate of injured fruit was reduced by 50.3Ð72.8%, when compared with insecticide based treatment controls (Meng et al 1985). Codling moth control by male removal is effective only when populations are low and where isolation precludes reinfestation (Madsen et al 1976, Madsen andCarty 1979). Further, Huber et al (1979) speculated that the best chance of success for large scale pheromone mass trapping of male pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders), would be in an area where relatively low populations were present early in the cotton growing season and in an isolated cotton growing area.…”
Section: Infestation Of Petioles and Seed Podsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent experiments in Canada (MacLellan 1976, Madsen et al 1976 have shown that removal of adult males using pheromone traps can suppress codling moth populations. The life tables suggest that this technique should also be useful for codling moth control in Nelson, so long as nearby sources of immigrant moths are eliminated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring, combined with visual inspection for the codling moth, Laspeyresia pomonella, is successfully used to time sprays in British Columbia (581). MADSEN et al (582) have reported that, without the use of sprays, mass trapping of the codling moth resulted in population suppression and in the maintenance of fruit damage within acceptable commercial standards. Since the experiment was carried out in an isolated apple orchard, it is hard to predict the general applicability of a trap-out strategy.…”
Section: Lepidopteramentioning
confidence: 99%