2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01497.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobalt‐containing alloys and their ability to release cobalt and cause dermatitis

Abstract: The concentration of released cobalt was high enough to elicit allergic contact dermatitis in cobalt-sensitized patients. As the materials in the discs are used in wear parts of hard metal tools, individuals with contact allergy to cobalt may develop hand eczema when handling such materials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The release of cobalt varied significantly from different materials. The highest amount released from the hard metal alloys was 290 µg cobalt/cm 2 /week (170). Furthermore, Julander et al studied cobalt skin deposition in 24 workers from a plant producing gas turbines and space propulsion components (133).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of cobalt varied significantly from different materials. The highest amount released from the hard metal alloys was 290 µg cobalt/cm 2 /week (170). Furthermore, Julander et al studied cobalt skin deposition in 24 workers from a plant producing gas turbines and space propulsion components (133).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that release of metal ions from metal surfaces (alloys or platings) is not directly related to the metal content (5,12,13). We know that human sweat influences the release of nickel metal ions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two ALF compositional differences reported in the literature include either the use of glycine (Thelohan and Demeringo, 1994) or an equivalent mass of glycerol (Stopford et al, 2003), herein described as glycine-ALF and glycerol-ALF, respectively. Surrogate sweat (pH 6.4–6.6) that was used was prepared according to the EN 1811 standardized test, which is commonly used for allergenic response from nickel, chromium, cobalt and other metals in alloys (Bocca et al, 2007; EN, 2009; Julander et al, 2009; Midander et al, 2007b). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral bioaccessibility tests are the most frequently investigated with the test methodology ranging from a static gastric compartment (Drexler and Brattin, 2007; EN, 2002; Stopford et al, 2003; U.S.EPA, 2007) to dynamic gastrointestinal models (Garcia et al, 2001; Juhasz et al, 2009; Rodriguez and Basta, 1999; Ruby et al, 1996; Velasco-Reynold et al, 2008). While multiple gastric methods persist, alloy dermal biofluid studies have generally used the EN 1811 reference method for allergenic responses via skin contact (Bocca et al, 2007; Flint, 1998; Julander et al, 2009; Midander et al, 2007b). However, far fewer studies have applied in vitro bioaccessibility tests to lung (Herting et al, 2008b; Midander et al, 2007b; Stopford et al, 2003; Thelohan and Demeringo, 1994; Twining et al, 2005; Vitarella et al, 2000) or internal implantation (Herting et al, 2008a; Stopford et al, 2003) biofluids to assess inhalation exposure to alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%