1997
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1997.5012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalescence of Protein-Stabilized Emulsions in a High-Pressure Homogenizer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been reported that greater protein concentrations result in larger electrostatic repulsive forces between colliding droplets. 43 It was observed that the Ke of β-lg-stabilized nanoemulsions was not affected markedly by β-lg concentration, likely due to greater surface charge of β-lg relative to SPI and WPI. In fact, the Ke value of nanoemulsions prepared using the lowest concentration of β-lg (1%) was not greater than the corresponding values for WPI and SPI at the highest concentration (8%), highlighting the potent stabilizing effect of β-lg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has also been reported that greater protein concentrations result in larger electrostatic repulsive forces between colliding droplets. 43 It was observed that the Ke of β-lg-stabilized nanoemulsions was not affected markedly by β-lg concentration, likely due to greater surface charge of β-lg relative to SPI and WPI. In fact, the Ke value of nanoemulsions prepared using the lowest concentration of β-lg (1%) was not greater than the corresponding values for WPI and SPI at the highest concentration (8%), highlighting the potent stabilizing effect of β-lg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4 . In reality, however, the coalescence between drops always proceeds to some extent during homogenization, and the emulsion size may be infl uenced by the drop-drop interactions even if the emulsifiers can be promptly adsorbed at the interface to form a protective barrier 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S is equal to gradP 3/2 w 1/2 / 3/2 in a high pressure homogenizer, gradP being the pressure gradient and w being the channel width. 35 With the instrument used, 36 We could not make foams with the other devices at our disposal in the laboratory: bubbling gas (at most ten bubbles of millimetre radius produced per second) or in microfluidic devices (gas and liquid flow rates below 100ml/h , bubble sizes of the order of 100 m) for which the shear rates are below ̇ ~ 10 2 s -1 . This leads to F h ~ 10 -15 N for a particle of radius equal to 100 nm, i.e.…”
Section: Foam Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%