Coaching player decision making in rugby union: exploring coaches espoused theories and theories in use as an indicator of effective coaching practice

Abstract

Introduction: Researchers exploring how coaches can best support the development of their players decision making within team invasion sports have often been conducted from a cognitive or ecological approach, which differ in their views regarding the presence and absence of memory representations. This difference has, in turn, resulted in practical implications that are theoretically different, but not pedagogically different. Research has categorised such approaches to coaching decision making into intentional decision making training or incidental decision making training that offer different suggestions for how coaching methods may be used within their practice. Sometimes, these categories of training have been offered as the way coaches should operate over the careful selection of coaching methods given their intentions for impact. Instead, within this study we aim to explore the pragmatic nature of coaching practice, rather than adherence only to theoretical principles or beliefs. Materials and Methods: In this study five English Regional Academy Rugby Union Coaches participated in a semi-structured interview, three categorised systematic observations of their coaching practice and a self-confrontation interview to explore; (i) the espoused theories coaches believe they use in practice; (ii) the theories in use within their coaching practice and; (iii) the alignment and misalignment between their espoused theories and theories in use during their coaching practice.Results & Discussion:: Our findings demonstrate that coaches employed a balance and blend of intentional and incidental coaching methods concurrently. Coaches proposed the use of non-linear pedagogy and the manipulation of constraints to promote learning activities which captured the representative nature of the competitive decision making environment. Yet also promoted the role and importance of shared mental models, tactical frameworks, off field video analysis and deliberate if-then rules of thumb when supporting the development of their players decision making. Thematic analysis extracted from interview data regarding coaches espoused theories, alongside the coaches theories in use, captured through categorised frequencies of coach behaviours and learning activities through systematic observations, present clear misalignments between proposed coaching methods and ARTICLE HISTORY

Coaching adaptive skill and expertise in Premier League football academies—paving a way forward for research and practice

“… Use retrospective analyses and stimulated recall of critical incidents to reconstruct the dynamics and problem-solving strategies used to approach critical challenges using participant interviews and other data [e.g., critical decision method ( 67 )]. Field observations, which identify coherence of intentions, what is espoused (what coaches say they do) and what is in use [coach actions; ( 11 )]. Therefore, in the desire to understand what skilful coaching looks, sounds and feels like, and answer third and final question in this paper, these methods should be adopted, carefully developed, combined and employed over an appropriate length of time which allows a true appreciation of context (e.g., a competitive football season).…”

“…Field observations, which identify coherence of intentions, what is espoused (what coaches say they do) and what is in use [coach actions; ( 11 )].…”

“…These authors have often employed systematic observation methods to investigate the self-awareness of coaches by investigating the alignment between what coaches say they intend to do vs. their behaviours in practice ( 7 ). Whilst this self-awareness is useful for coaches, if we are to truly explore coaching skill and expertise, there is an opportunity to move beyond systematic behavioural observation that captures what coaches do ( 11 ). To achieve this, research should aim to capture, make sense of, and appreciate the day to day challenges of skilful academy football coaches, alongside the contextual skills, attributes, knowledge and experiences required to solve them.…”

The 3Ps: A tool for coach observation

“…This dialogic approach may allow for researchers to utilise some of the tools that have been developed with the purpose of helping coaches to plan for and reflect on their practice, for example, the Coaching Planning, Practice and Reflective Framework (38,39), and the "Big 5" structured approach to critical reflection (40). However, if these are employed as a means of generating feedback, there may be limited utility for the coach who is more fully aware of the pedagogical strategies that they are deploying (41). In short, whilst offering utility, behavioral observation behavioural observation remains subject to the critique that: When the tasks that people are doing are complex, it is not enough to simply observe people's actions and behaviourswhat they do.…”

The adaptable coach – a critical review of the practical implications for traditional and constraints-led approaches in sport coaching

“…20 Skilled coaches often demonstrate the integration of traditional and CLA methodologies effectively -perhaps even within one practice session -for the enhancement of movement skills, with each approach presenting distinctive strengths and weaknesses. 6,15,17,21 We contend, therefore, that throughout the coaching process understanding how to utilise each approach, or principles of each approach, considered against the background of influencing factorsincluding the athlete and their targeted learning goalsis a key objective for skill development. 2 Comprehending the diverse learning outcomes of traditional coaching and CLA can aid coaches in determining the most suitable approach for each learning scenario.…”