“…Most of the work has been done within the boundaries of the CO 2 hydrogenation plant, performing optimizations of the process parameters [14], estimations of the maxima CO 2 abated [15], or required costs (methanol and H 2 price or CO 2 tax) to make a green methanol plant affordable [16][17][18][19]. Khojasteh-Salkuyeh et al [20] performed a more specific study on the thermal efficiency of methanol production plants, and concluded that CO 2 hydrogenation can produce methanol more efficiently than dry reforming (48% vs 41% LHV) but still far from the conventional route (autothermal or steam reforming of methane) (68%). Nevertheless, their LCA suggested that CO 2 net zero emissions will be only achieved with very low electricity GHG intensity, making necessary the use of RES, especially for H 2 production.…”