2016
DOI: 10.1117/1.oe.56.1.011022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 laser microprocessing for laser damage growth mitigation of fused silica optics

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intensifications diffracted by three particular defects are now investigated experimentally. Defect 1 ensues from pollution by a drop of solvent, defect 2 is an AR bump caused by a particle on the substrate during AR coating deposition, while defect 3 is the mitigation of a laserinduced damage site made by using a CO 2 laser [7] 034008-7 (Defects 1 and 2 are coating defects, AR layer with refraction index: n AR = 1.22; the phase shifts will be defined by φ i = k 0 h i (n AR − 1) where h i are mechanical heights.). The intensifications by these three defects are measured using a setup which probes the diffracted intensity [11].…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intensifications diffracted by three particular defects are now investigated experimentally. Defect 1 ensues from pollution by a drop of solvent, defect 2 is an AR bump caused by a particle on the substrate during AR coating deposition, while defect 3 is the mitigation of a laserinduced damage site made by using a CO 2 laser [7] 034008-7 (Defects 1 and 2 are coating defects, AR layer with refraction index: n AR = 1.22; the phase shifts will be defined by φ i = k 0 h i (n AR − 1) where h i are mechanical heights.). The intensifications by these three defects are measured using a setup which probes the diffracted intensity [11].…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffraction patterns caused by the defects yield local high-field intensities that increase the probability of laser-induced damage [5]. Defects can occur from polishing processes [6], antireflective (AR) coating deposition, laser-induced damage mitigation [7], optics handling, contamination [8], or just from the interaction between light and the optical components [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental system that has been used in this work has been described in details in Ref. 16 . We will only briefly indicate the main specifications of interest for the present work.…”
Section: Experiments a Experimental Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 laser processing of glass has been used for decades, but it is still a very active field of research to develop innovative processes. Recent interests include for instance optics manufacturing [1][2][3][4] , surface micromachining [5][6][7][8] , to produce refractive or diffractive optical elements, processing of optical fibers [9][10][11][12][13] , including end-facet, fiber or cladding processing, or mitigation of surface damage in high power laser components [14][15][16][17][18] , such as laser damage or scratches. The CO 2 laser-material interaction is particularly suitable for thermal treatments and processing of fused silica because this glass has a high thermal shock resistance due to a low thermal expansion coefficient 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring laser damage growth on vacuum windows is essential to control the quality of laser beams and to limit the operating costs using optics mitigation [17,18,19]. Thus, observation systems have been developed to track laser damage sites without removing fused silica components after each laser shot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%