2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-016-0173-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 adsorption at high pressures in MCM-41 and derived alkali-containing samples: the role of the textural properties and chemical affinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5−7 However, it suffers from some inherent drawbacks, including degradation/loss, volatilization, corrosion, and high energy consumption. Therefore, a variety of promising solid adsorbents have been proposed for CO 2 capture in recent years, such as metal-oxides, 8 carbonates, 9 zeolites, 10,11 activated carbonaceous materials, 12 microporous/mesoporous silica, 13 amine-modified materials, 14−17 covalent organic frameworks (COFs), 18,19 and metal−organic frameworks (MOFs). 20−22 Among these sorbents, amine-modified porous materials, especially porous polymers, are recognized to be advantageous for CO 2 capture because of their high porosity, multifunctional active groups, simple preparation process, and low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5−7 However, it suffers from some inherent drawbacks, including degradation/loss, volatilization, corrosion, and high energy consumption. Therefore, a variety of promising solid adsorbents have been proposed for CO 2 capture in recent years, such as metal-oxides, 8 carbonates, 9 zeolites, 10,11 activated carbonaceous materials, 12 microporous/mesoporous silica, 13 amine-modified materials, 14−17 covalent organic frameworks (COFs), 18,19 and metal−organic frameworks (MOFs). 20−22 Among these sorbents, amine-modified porous materials, especially porous polymers, are recognized to be advantageous for CO 2 capture because of their high porosity, multifunctional active groups, simple preparation process, and low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curtailing CO 2 emission through energy consumption reduction as well as carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is necessary to mitigate the global issue. Currently, the most important industrialized CO 2 capture technology is chemical absorption using aqueous organic amines like monoethanolamine (MEA) as absorbent to removal of CO 2 from flue gas. However, it suffers from some inherent drawbacks, including degradation/loss, volatilization, corrosion, and high energy consumption. Therefore, a variety of promising solid adsorbents have been proposed for CO 2 capture in recent years, such as metal-oxides, carbonates, zeolites, , activated carbonaceous materials, microporous/mesoporous silica, amine-modified materials, covalent organic frameworks (COFs), , and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Among these sorbents, amine-modified porous materials, especially porous polymers, are recognized to be advantageous for CO 2 capture because of their high porosity, multifunctional active groups, simple preparation process, and low cost . Amine is usually incorporated by two approaches: impregnation and surface grafting .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amine-functionalized solid adsorbents, on the other hand, can be regenerated at low temperature (<373 K) and have high CO 2 adsorption capacities at low CO 2 partial pressure . In this regard, amine-functionalized porous silica materials, such as MCM-41 and SBA-15, were extensively studied for their CO 2 capturing performance. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%