2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1017-2_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 Absorption in a Mini-module Membrane Contactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, water offers an elementary absorbing agent for removing CO 2 without necessitating the use of chemical solvents. Higher CO 2 removal values by absorption into water have also been reported reaching 76 %, and >95 % in a mini‐module membrane contactor, but at the expense of water consumption (liquid‐to‐gas flow rate ratio exceeds 30) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Still, water offers an elementary absorbing agent for removing CO 2 without necessitating the use of chemical solvents. Higher CO 2 removal values by absorption into water have also been reported reaching 76 %, and >95 % in a mini‐module membrane contactor, but at the expense of water consumption (liquid‐to‐gas flow rate ratio exceeds 30) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Membrane‐based gas absorption is gaining attention as an alternative to industrially well‐established gas separation equipment, such as packed columns, because of membrane modules' high mass transfer area (known a priori), modular design, easy scale‐up, and straightforward modelling of their flow behaviour . The main disadvantage of such equipment is the additional resistance to mass transfer imposed by the membrane when wetted by the liquid absorbent; any pore wetting considerably affects the efficiency of the process because of the slower diffusion of the gaseous species in the liquid phase than that in the gas phase .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CO 2 removal using membrane-based gas absorption and reaction is gaining attention as an alternative to well-established industrial gas-separation and reaction equipment, such as reactive-absorption columns, because of the high mass transfer area (known a priori ) of the membrane modules per unit volume, their modular design, and easy scale-up of the process. A membrane bundle containing hundreds of fibers is placed within the membrane module with a customizable length, and it may provide a modular solution for easy lab- and pilot-testing with a specific surface area in the range of 1500–7000 m 2 /m 3 compared to 100–800 m 2 /m 3 for conventional devices …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%