2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-substrate strategy for improved power production and chlorophenol degradation in a microbial fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbial reduction is generally a low-cost and environmentally friendly method to convert hazardous wastes into harmless products. , Some microorganisms have been reported capable of completely mineralizing 4-CP to the harmless CO 2 when coupled with denitrification . The practical drawbacks include needing long acclimation and residence times …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial reduction is generally a low-cost and environmentally friendly method to convert hazardous wastes into harmless products. , Some microorganisms have been reported capable of completely mineralizing 4-CP to the harmless CO 2 when coupled with denitrification . The practical drawbacks include needing long acclimation and residence times …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon cloth electrodes (projected area, 5 cm × 3 cm; reaction surface, 30 cm 2 from W1S1010, Ce Tech Co., Ltd, Taiwan) were placed in both the anodic and cathodic chambers. An external resistance (R) of 1000 Ω, which was applied in our previous study, 23 connected the two electrodes using copper wires (Figure 1). The MFCs were cultivated by sequencing batch models at 35°C with static conditions (without mixing).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of glucose and penicillin as cosubstrate in the anodic chamber of MFC had resulted in enhancing the metabolism of microbial communities due to the availability of sufficient carbon from the cosubstrate; as a result, the rate of electron transfer was improved and consequently enhanced the output power [79]. On the other hand, when acetate was used as cosubstrate along with 4-chlorophenol (CP) as substrate, the removal rate of CP was increased from about 53.7% to 93.7% with 12 h of operational time and power density also increased by fourfolds compared to MFC operated without acetate [80]. Thus, the incorporation of cosubstrates along with ECs as substrate or vice-versa could result in better removal of these pollutants with concomitant improved power production; thereby, presenting a close link between metabolic activity of microbes and composition of substrate in BES.…”
Section: Type Of Anolytementioning
confidence: 99%