Co-occurence of substance abuse with conduct, anxiety, and depression disorders in juvenile delinquents

Neighbors, Bryan; Kempton, Tracy; Forehand, Rex

doi:10.1016/0306-4603(92)90043-u

Cited by 137 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Indices of behavioral undercontrol, such as conduct disorder and delinquency, predict alcohol use and alcohol-related problems both cross-sectionally (Moss & Kirisci, 1995;Neighbors, Kempton, & Forehand, 1992) and prospectively (Brown, Gleghorn, Schuckit, Myers, & Mott, 1996;Johnson, Arria, Borges, Ialongo, & Anthony, 1995). In addition, behavioral undercontrol is a robust predictor of course of alcohol involvement among adolescents and young adults (Bates & Labouvie, 1997;Bennett et al, 1999;Chassin et al, 2002;Colder et al, 2002;Hill et al, 2000;Stice, Myers, & Brown, 1998;Tucker et al, 2003;White, Xie, Thompson, Loeber, & Stouthamer-Loeber, 2001;Wills et al, 1996).…”

Section: Behavioral Undercontrolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Similarities and Differences of Longitudinal Phenotypes Across Alternate Indices of Alcohol Involvement: A Methodologic Comparison of Trajectory Approaches.

Jackson¹,

Sher²

2005

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extant developmental research distinguishing young adults who moderate versus persist in alcohol consumption has not consistently evaluated the domain of alcohol involvement being modeled, making it difficult to compare findings across studies. In the present study, the authors characterized the developmental course of 5 indices of alcohol involvement using a prospective (6-wave) sample of 377 young adults (Year 1 age = 18.52 years; 55% female; 51% with family history of alcoholism) over 11 years. Growth mixture models were applied to each measure. Despite similarity in trajectory shape, predicted prevalences varied, and the consistency of trajectory classifications across alternate indices revealed low agreement. Correlates of drinking course, however, were somewhat robust across alcohol index. The finding that trajectories are conditional on the specific indices used suggests that it may be hazardous to generalize across alternate indices of alcohol involvement. Keywordsalcohol; drinking; trajectory; course; developmental Early young adulthood (ages 18-25 years) represents the period of peak prevalence for alcohol use (Gallup Organization, 1987) and alcohol use disorders (AUDs) (Grant, 1997), and the transition from high school to college is a time of risk for heavy drinking (Baer, Kivlahan, & Marlatt, 1995;Johnston, O'Malley, & Bachman, 2002a, 2002b. As young adults age beyond college, however, many exhibit a tendency to moderate heavy alcohol involvement (Donovan, Jessor, & Jessor, 1983;Perkins, 1999). In the population, alcohol consumption (particularly heavy drinking), problem drinking, and AUDs tend to peak in the early 20s and then show a decline over the third decade of life (Dawson, Grant, Stinson, & Chou, 2004; Fillmore, 1988;Jessor, Donovan, & Costa, 1991;Johnston et al., 2002aJohnston et al., , 2002bMuthén & Muthén, 2000). Against this normative decrease, many young adults continue to drink heavily (Windle, 1988), continue to have drinking problems (Fillmore, 1988;Tubman, Vicary, von Eye, & Lerner, 1990;Windle, 1988), and manifest AUDs (Zucker, Fitzgerald, & Moses, 1995). Thus, a central question of research into the etiology of alcoholism concerns factors that distinguish young adults who moderate their alcohol consumption from those who persist in heavy drinking. Yet, until recently, relatively little research has addressed variability in typical courses of alcohol involvement during this rapidly changing period of life of early young adulthood (recently termed "emerging adulthood"; Arnett, 2000). In the present study, we addressed three central research questions: (a) whether there exist prototypical courses of Copyright 2005 by the American Psychological AssociationCorrespondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kristina M. Jackson, who is now at the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-BH, Providence, RI 02912. kristina_jackson@brown.edu. NIH Public Access Author ManuscriptPsychol Addict Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 July 7. ...

show abstract

Section: Behavioral Undercontrolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Similarities and Differences of Longitudinal Phenotypes Across Alternate Indices of Alcohol Involvement: A Methodologic Comparison of Trajectory Approaches.

Jackson¹,

Sher²

2005

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among the papers, 11 did not use a standardized psychiatric interview for adolescents and were excluded. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The reasons for exclusion of another 26 papers were (total counts were up to a higher number because multiple exclusion criteria could apply to 1 study): 12 papers included a highly selective population, such as adolescents referred to psychiatric services, [20][21][22] adolescents with SUD, [23][24][25] patients with CD, 26 or homicidal juvenile delinquents [27][28][29][30][31] ; 11 papers did not provide prevalence rates for male and female adolescents separately 20,21,26,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] ; 1 paper selected participants if nursing staff found detained adolescents appropriate to collaborate 39 ; 1 paper used a mixed sample of adolescents and young adults resulting in a mean age of 20 years 40 ; 1 paper used a diagnostic interview that was based on a DSM-III nomenclature without providing detailed information on how the interview was keyed to DSM-IV 41 ; 3 papers based diagnosis on a combination of standardized interviews and other information, which resulted in unclear diagnostic decision-making 35,42,43 ; and 3 papers presented res...…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychiatric Disorders in Detained Male Adolescents: A Systematic Literature Review

Colins

Vermeiren

Vreugdenhil³

et al. 2010

Can J Psychiatry

183

125

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To provide a best estimate of the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among detained male adolescents, with particular emphasis on impairment, multi-informant assessment, and race or ethnicity. Method:Computer-assisted searches were executed to identify relevant studies.Results: Fifteen studies using adolescents as informants met inclusion criteria (n = 3401), of which only 2 reported within a subsample on parent-derived diagnoses. The mean prevalence of any disorder was 69.9% (95% CI 69.5% to 70.3%); with conduct disorder occurring most frequently (46.4%, 95% CI 45.6% to 47.3%), followed by substance use disorder (45.1%, 95% CI 44.6% to 45.5%), oppositional defiant disorder (19.8%, 95% CI 19.2% to 20.3%), and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (13.5%, 95% CI 13.2% to 13.9%). Although lower, rates for internalizing disorders were still substantial, with any anxiety disorder found in 15.9% (95% CI 15.6% to 16.1%), major depression in 12.0% (95% CI 11.7% to 12.2%), and posttraumatic stress disorder in 9.6% (95% CI 9.2% to 10.0%). Three studies reported on psychotic disorders, finding low rates (1.35%, 95% CI 1.32% to 1.39%). Estimates of prevalence were only marginally different when impairment was not required, while consistency between adolescents and parents was poor. Findings on the relations between race or ethnicity were too scarce and inconsistent to interpret. Conclusion:Detained male adolescents bear substantial mental health needs, emphasizing the need to organize effective mental health services for this troubled group. However, our knowledge on mental disorders in detained youth should be enhanced, in particular regarding the reliability of adolescents, compared with parent report, and whether clinically relevant differences exist by race or ethnicity.Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55(4):255-263. Clinical Implications· Across countries, detained and incarcerated adolescents have substantial mental health needs. · Standardized mental health screening at detention intakes is warranted. · Effective mental health services should be developed. Limitations· The systematic search of the literature was restricted to detained and incarcerated male adolescents only. · The number of studies on psychiatric disorders in detained male adolescents using a standardized psychiatric interview is still small. · Methodological differences hamper comparison and interpretation of the 15 index study results.

show abstract

“…Rates of those who used substances on a daily basis were as follows: tobacco, 76%; cocaine, 8%; hallucinogens, 4.4%; amphetamines, 19%; marijuana, 50%; barbiturates, 12%; and alcohol, 28%. Neighbors et al (1992) reported that 47% of a sample of 111 incarcerated youths met criteria for a diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence. Of those diagnosed, 44% were diagnosed as manifesting alcohol abuse or dependence, alone or in conjunction with marijuana use or dependence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of Alcohol and Drug Use in an Adolescent Training Facility

Lebeau-Craven

Stein

Barnett

et al. 2003

Substance Use & Misuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates substance use and crimes among incarcerated adolescents. Chart reviews were conducted between 1997-2000 with 186 adolescent, male offenders, including information on demographics, substance use, and crimes. Results indicate that use of alcohol (88.7%) and marijuana (95.7%) was highly prevalent. The most widely committed crimes included possession of a controlled substance (31.8%), receiving stolen goods (17.8%), and violation of probation (17.2%). Significant differences were observed across racial/ethnic groups; White nonHispanic adolescents were more likely to use cocaine, hallucinogens, and heroin than adolescents of other races. Future research examining relationships between criminal behavior, substance use, and cultural variations in use patterns and delinquency will allow more relevant intervention and prevention strategies in this population.

show abstract

Co-occurence of substance abuse with conduct, anxiety, and depression disorders in juvenile delinquents

Cited by 137 publications

References 14 publications

Similarities and Differences of Longitudinal Phenotypes Across Alternate Indices of Alcohol Involvement: A Methodologic Comparison of Trajectory Approaches.

Similarities and Differences of Longitudinal Phenotypes Across Alternate Indices of Alcohol Involvement: A Methodologic Comparison of Trajectory Approaches.

Psychiatric Disorders in Detained Male Adolescents: A Systematic Literature Review

Prevalence of Alcohol and Drug Use in an Adolescent Training Facility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About