Objective: To provide a best estimate of the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among detained male adolescents, with particular emphasis on impairment, multi-informant assessment, and race or ethnicity.
Method:Computer-assisted searches were executed to identify relevant studies.Results: Fifteen studies using adolescents as informants met inclusion criteria (n = 3401), of which only 2 reported within a subsample on parent-derived diagnoses. The mean prevalence of any disorder was 69.9% (95% CI 69.5% to 70.3%); with conduct disorder occurring most frequently (46.4%, 95% CI 45.6% to 47.3%), followed by substance use disorder (45.1%, 95% CI 44.6% to 45.5%), oppositional defiant disorder (19.8%, 95% CI 19.2% to 20.3%), and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (13.5%, 95% CI 13.2% to 13.9%). Although lower, rates for internalizing disorders were still substantial, with any anxiety disorder found in 15.9% (95% CI 15.6% to 16.1%), major depression in 12.0% (95% CI 11.7% to 12.2%), and posttraumatic stress disorder in 9.6% (95% CI 9.2% to 10.0%). Three studies reported on psychotic disorders, finding low rates (1.35%, 95% CI 1.32% to 1.39%). Estimates of prevalence were only marginally different when impairment was not required, while consistency between adolescents and parents was poor. Findings on the relations between race or ethnicity were too scarce and inconsistent to interpret.
Conclusion:Detained male adolescents bear substantial mental health needs, emphasizing the need to organize effective mental health services for this troubled group. However, our knowledge on mental disorders in detained youth should be enhanced, in particular regarding the reliability of adolescents, compared with parent report, and whether clinically relevant differences exist by race or ethnicity.Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55(4):255-263.
Clinical Implications· Across countries, detained and incarcerated adolescents have substantial mental health needs. · Standardized mental health screening at detention intakes is warranted. · Effective mental health services should be developed.
Limitations· The systematic search of the literature was restricted to detained and incarcerated male adolescents only. · The number of studies on psychiatric disorders in detained male adolescents using a standardized psychiatric interview is still small. · Methodological differences hamper comparison and interpretation of the 15 index study results.
Comparison with data from community and juvenile justice studies shows an ascending trend of comorbidity rates of externalizing disorders from community to clinical and finally to juvenile justice samples. It seems that young addicts with comorbid disorders are at high risk of ending up in the juvenile justice system.
Neither the empirical nor the DSM-oriented YSR scales adequately screen for DSM/DISC-C psychiatric disorders among incarcerated boys. The use of the YSR and the DISC-C to assess DSM constructs results in, at least partially, different diagnostic information.
There is some debate about whether or not sex offenders are similar to non-sex offenders with regard to family background (parental characteristics), personality, and psychopathology. The central aim of this study focused on the comparison of juvenile sex offenders and non-sex offenders. The sample consisted of incarcerated juvenile male sex (n = 30) and non-sex (n = 368) offenders. It appeared that sex offenders resembled non-sex offenders with respect to most of the offender and parental characteristics. Results demonstrated some differences between both groups, while the majority of characteristics were similar. Limitations of the study are discussed, especially the low number of sex offenders, followed by suggestions for further research.
The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs) among incarcerated boys, and comorbidity patterns and the relationship between SUDs and violent offending and criminal recidivism. The presence of SUDs and other psychiatric disorders was assessed in a representative sample of 204 incarcerated boys aged 12 to 18 years using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC). Ninety-two percent had used alcohol, 86% had used cannabis, and 33% had used other substances. The 6-month prevalence of SUDs was 55%, and 22% reported polysubstance abuse or dependence. SUDs were positively associated with comorbid externalizing and psychotic disorders. Substance dependence was negatively associated with violent offending but not with criminal recidivism. These high prevalence rates call for more attention to diagnosis and management of SUDs among incarcerated male adolescents. The negative association between substance dependence and the violent nature of the index offense needs further investigation.
This study investigated the prevalence of psychotic symptoms among incarcerated boys as well as the relationship between these symptoms and violent offending and criminal recidivism. The presence of psychotic symptoms was assessed in a representative sample of 204 incarcerated boys aged 12-18 using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-2.3). Seventy-two percent of the study participants had committed a violent index offense and 30 percent were criminal recidivists. Thirty-four percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27-41%) were DISC-2.3 psychosis screen positive: 25% (95% CI: 19-31%) reported at least one pathognomonic of schizophrenia symptom and 9% (95% CI: 6-14%) reported at least three non-pathognomonic psychotic symptoms. In addition, 33 percent (95% CI: 26-40%) reported one or two isolated, atypical psychotic symptoms. The presence of psychotic symptoms was not associated with violent offending or criminal recidivism. The high prevalence rate of psychotic symptoms among incarcerated boys calls for increased attention to diagnosis and treatment of psychosis. To obtain conclusive answers regarding the relationship between psychosis and violent offending, additional studies are needed in general population samples.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.