2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13137203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-Housing Response to Social Isolation of COVID-19 Outbreak, with a Focus on Gender Implications

Abstract: COVID-19 forced billions of people to restructure their daily lives and social habits. Several research projects have focused on social impacts, approaching the phenomenon on the basis of different issues and scales. This work studies the changes in social relations within the well-defined urban-territorial elements of co-housing communities. The peculiarity of this research lies in the essence of these communities, which base their existence on the spirit of sharing spaces and activities. As social distancing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with the new challenges that COVID-19 lockdown measures brought to attention on housing environments, stressing the need for healthy, comfortable, and sustainable living places [ 46 , 48 ]. The data also emphasized the possible need for novel and more technological tools for flexible interior design modifications [ 49 ], common recreational open spaces, and vegetation views [ 20 , 50 , 51 ], as well as workspace adaptations [ 24 , 41 ]. Our findings also support a positive association between self-reported mental health symptomatology and indoor quality features, such as the presence of plant plots, or greater amounts of sunlight, as also reported in previous European studies [ 37 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with the new challenges that COVID-19 lockdown measures brought to attention on housing environments, stressing the need for healthy, comfortable, and sustainable living places [ 46 , 48 ]. The data also emphasized the possible need for novel and more technological tools for flexible interior design modifications [ 49 ], common recreational open spaces, and vegetation views [ 20 , 50 , 51 ], as well as workspace adaptations [ 24 , 41 ]. Our findings also support a positive association between self-reported mental health symptomatology and indoor quality features, such as the presence of plant plots, or greater amounts of sunlight, as also reported in previous European studies [ 37 , 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the COVID-19 crisis, the advantage of individual over collective housing was emphasized. As a result, different debates on the re-examination of existing housing typologies, e.g., [92,[139][140][141][142], have been launched. The residents of houses had an exclusive and unrestricted access to the private open space, and usually a higher level of spatial comfort which was useful for keeping the prescribed physical distance and maintaining the isolation period more easily.…”
Section: Closed Space (Re)designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate over the complex balance between interdependence and individualism remains ongoing [ 79 ]. Cohousing may offer a form of residential environment that is attractive to individuals looking for a sense of belonging to a community and who feel that today’s urban lifestyles do not foster mutual support [ 80 ]. However, some people also argue that the type of relationship created in a cohousing community is closer to that of a traditional community and is not always desirable for those who may sometimes choose not to interact with fellow residents because they often prefer privacy [ 81 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%