Clustered Bacteremias in a Hemodialysis Unit Cross-Contamination
                        of Blood Tubing From Ultrafiltrate Waste

Longfield, Robert N.; Wortham, William G.; Fletcher, Linda L.; Nauscheutz, William F.

doi:10.1086/646500

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The procedure remains potentially hazardous to patients, and numerous clusters of gram-negative bacteremia and pyrogenic reactions (PR) have been reported. Most such clusters have been traced to bacterial contamination of water and/or dialysate [3,4], errors in dialyzer reprocessing [5][6][7], and improper setup procedures [8][9][10]. In this paper, we describe an outbreak of Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infections and PR at Hôpital Charles-LeMoyne, a 590-bed university-affiliated teaching hospital in the Montreal area, that was first detected in August 1995 when five episodes of bacteremia occurred among the dialysis unit's 60 chronic hemodialysis patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Cluster of Bloodstream Infections and Pyrogenic Reactions among Hemodialysis Patients Traced to Dialysis Machine Waste-Handling Option Units

et al. 1998

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From June 17 through November 15, 1995, ten episodes of Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infection and three pyrogenic reactions occurred in patients at a hospital-based hemodialysis center. In a case-control study limited to events occurring during October 1–31, 1995, seven dialysis sessions resulting in E. cloacae bacteremia or pyrogenic reaction without bacteremia were compared with 241 randomly selected control sessions. Dialysis machines were examined, dialysis fluid and equipment were cultured, and E. cloacae isolates were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Each dialysis machine had a waste-handling option (WHO) through which dialyzer-priming fluid was discarded before each dialysis session; in 7 of 11 machines, one-way check valves designed to prevent backflow from the WHO into patient bloodlines were dysfunctional. In the case-control study, case sessions were more frequent when machines with ≥1 dysfunctional check valves were used. E. cloacae with identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were isolated from case patients, dialysis fluid, station drains, and WHO units. Our investigation shows that bloodstream infections and pyrogenic reactions were caused by backflow from contaminated dialysis machine WHO units into patient bloodlines. The outbreak was terminated when WHO use was discontinued, check valves were replaced, and dialysis machine disinfection was enhanced.

show abstract