1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.56.693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster-variation-method simulations of theM1xMxPt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an Ising Hamiltonian, Aguilera-Granja et al showed that in the Co 1−x Mn x Pt pseudo-binary system, homo-atomic exchange interactions, J CoCo and J MnMn were both positive whereas J CoMn was small, but negative. By fitting the simulation results to the experimental magnetic phase diagram, it was concluded that the antiferromagnetic J CoMn was responsible for the frustrated magnetic system which gave rise to the occurrence of the reentrant spin glass in Co 1−x Mn x Pt [20]. As both Mn and Co magnetic moments found to be positive for Co 78−x Mn x B 10 Si 12 , it is likely that the antiferromagnetic Co-Mn pair interactions are largely responsible for the reentrant spin glass behavior observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using an Ising Hamiltonian, Aguilera-Granja et al showed that in the Co 1−x Mn x Pt pseudo-binary system, homo-atomic exchange interactions, J CoCo and J MnMn were both positive whereas J CoMn was small, but negative. By fitting the simulation results to the experimental magnetic phase diagram, it was concluded that the antiferromagnetic J CoMn was responsible for the frustrated magnetic system which gave rise to the occurrence of the reentrant spin glass in Co 1−x Mn x Pt [20]. As both Mn and Co magnetic moments found to be positive for Co 78−x Mn x B 10 Si 12 , it is likely that the antiferromagnetic Co-Mn pair interactions are largely responsible for the reentrant spin glass behavior observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%