2002
DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster of clinical isolates of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA) with a negative deoxyribonuclease (DNase) test–implications for laboratory diagnosis and infection control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that rare strains of S. aureus might be coagulase-negative. In addition, 5% (6/119) of the isolates were negative by the DNase test, which was also reported by Rao et al (2002) and Kateete et al (2010). Other biochemical tests included mannitol semi-solid medium, semi-solid glucose medium, maltose plus purple agar base, urease, catalase, and oxidase.…”
Section: Bacterial Identificationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…It should be noted that rare strains of S. aureus might be coagulase-negative. In addition, 5% (6/119) of the isolates were negative by the DNase test, which was also reported by Rao et al (2002) and Kateete et al (2010). Other biochemical tests included mannitol semi-solid medium, semi-solid glucose medium, maltose plus purple agar base, urease, catalase, and oxidase.…”
Section: Bacterial Identificationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The objective of the DNAse test in this study was to distinguish S. aureus from CoNS species. However, this test should be used with caution since it may identify CoNS isolates as S. aureus or S. aureus isolates as CoNS as reported in other studies (Rao et al, 2002;Bello and Qahtani, 2005;Kateete et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Rao et al (2002) detected four MRSA isolates with a negative DNAse result that were confirmed to be S. aureus. However, in the present study no DNAse-negative isolate was identified as S. aureus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, vancomycin emerged as the only drug to be reliably effective against MRSA infections. 7, 8 Zvethkova et al present in vitro susceptibility data on 2366 MRSA isolates collected over a fiveyear period. 1 The susceptibilities are interesting from an in vitro standpoint, but are clinically unreliable because in vitro susceptibility data against MRSA do not, per se, define or predict clinical efficacy in the treatment of MRSA infections.…”
Section: Oral Antibiotic Treatment Of Mrsa Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%