2019
DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2019.1640135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Club convergence analysis of ecological and carbon footprint: evidence from a cross-country analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is worse, particularly in developing countries where industrial emission and effluents create severe health issues for urban and periphery areas. Thus, there is a call for a comprehensive and strict environmental regulation due to the detrimental impact of human-induced climate change (Haider and Akram, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is worse, particularly in developing countries where industrial emission and effluents create severe health issues for urban and periphery areas. Thus, there is a call for a comprehensive and strict environmental regulation due to the detrimental impact of human-induced climate change (Haider and Akram, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the club convergence approach developed by Phillips and Sul [38], Solarin et al [39] indicated club convergence in ecological footprints and its subcomponents for 92 countries. Ulucak and Apergis [40] determined the existence of club convergence for 20 European countries, and Haider and Akram [41] confirmed the club convergence for 77 countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In other words, it amends the bias that ascends from both “stationary and non‐stationary or a mix of both series in the panel due to misspecification”. All conventional unit root tests and and simple regression may not account the heterogeneity of cross-sections as a result, they may provide misleading results [32] . Thus, PS include both “common and cross-section” specific behaviour and find multiple steady-states (club convergence) unlike “beta and sigma convergence”, which is built on a steady-state.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%