2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00139-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloudwater studies at a high elevation site in the Vosges Mountains (France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though many researchers have observed concentrations in fog that are higher than precipitation for a site [e.g., Jordan et al, 2000;Vong et al, 1997], results from this study indicate that in Hawaii, high fog water fluxes combine with several strong, sporadic chemical sources to result in higher deposition rates of several species than might be expected for a remote, marine environment. High deposition rates for chemical species in fog have been observed in many polluted environments and are a concern with regard to acid and metal deposition [e.g., Dollard et al, 1983;Harvey and McArthur, 1989;Herckes et al, 2002;Igawa et al, 1998]. Our study area is unusual in that the chemical sources determined for our sites are largely natural.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Though many researchers have observed concentrations in fog that are higher than precipitation for a site [e.g., Jordan et al, 2000;Vong et al, 1997], results from this study indicate that in Hawaii, high fog water fluxes combine with several strong, sporadic chemical sources to result in higher deposition rates of several species than might be expected for a remote, marine environment. High deposition rates for chemical species in fog have been observed in many polluted environments and are a concern with regard to acid and metal deposition [e.g., Dollard et al, 1983;Harvey and McArthur, 1989;Herckes et al, 2002;Igawa et al, 1998]. Our study area is unusual in that the chemical sources determined for our sites are largely natural.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Compared to this value, a 20% contribution at high alpine sites in Europe seems rather low, but can be explained by (a) higher wet precipitation in Achenkirch (1900-2300 mm at Christlumkopf vs. 1400 mm at Whiteface), (b) a higher liquid water content of the clouds at Whiteface (0.44 g m )3 vs. 0.12 g m )3 at Christlumkopf) and (c) higher cloud frequency at Whiteface (28% vs. 12% at Christlumkopf). These results on the contribution of occult deposition to total deposition in an Alpine area were supported by findings for the locations Hoher Peißenberg (980 m a.s.l., about 30 km north of Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany) (Pahl et al, 1994) and Aubure (1146 m a.s.l., Vosges Mountains, France) (Herckes et al, 2001) and highlight the importance of taking occult deposition into account in assessing whether the CLs are exceeded, especially for mountainous ecosystems close to the timber line.…”
Section: Importance Of the Occult Impact On Total Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, fog deposition significantly contributes to hydrological, nutrient and pollutant inputs in such mountainous regions. This is because high concentrations of solutes in fog water lead to fog deposition of these substances that can be as high as or higher than dry or wet deposition [ Igawa et al , 2002; Herckes et al , 2002; Lange et al , 2003]. The quantification of fog deposition onto forest canopies in mountainous areas is, therefore, of interest in terms of its effect on forest health and decline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%