Cloud-Based Service Information System for Evaluating Quality of Life after Breast Cancer Surgery

Abstract

ObjectiveAlthough recent studies have improved understanding of quality of life (QOL) outcomes of breast conserving surgery, few have used longitudinal data for more than two time points, and few have examined predictors of QOL over two years. Additionally, the longitudinal data analyses in such studies rarely apply the appropriate statistical methodology to control for censoring and inter-correlations arising from repeated measures obtained from the same patient pool. This study evaluated an internet-based system for measuring longitudinal changes in QOL and developed a cloud-based system for managing patients after breast conserving surgery.MethodsThis prospective study analyzed 657 breast cancer patients treated at three tertiary academic hospitals. Related hospital personnel such as surgeons and other healthcare professionals were also interviewed to determine the requirements for an effective cloud-based system for surveying QOL in breast cancer patients. All patients completed the SF-36, Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and its supplementary breast cancer measure (QLQ-BR23) at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The 95% confidence intervals for differences in responsiveness estimates were derived by bootstrap estimation. Scores derived by these instruments were interpreted by generalized estimating equation before and after surgery.ResultsAll breast cancer surgery patients had significantly improved QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 subscale scores throughout the 2-year follow-up period (p<0.05). During the study period, QOL generally had a negative association with advanced age, high Charlson comorbidity index score, tumor stage III or IV, previous chemotherapy, and long post-operative LOS. Conversely, QOL was positively associated with previous radiotherapy and hormone therapy. Additionally, patients with high scores for preoperative QOL tended to have high scores for QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23 and SF-36 subscales. Based on the results of usability testing, the five constructs were rated on a Likert scale from 1–7 as follows: system usefulness (5.6±1.8), ease of use (5.6±1.5), information quality (5.4±1.4), interface quality (5.5±1.4), and overall satisfaction (5.5±1.6).ConclusionsThe current trend in clinical medicine is applying therapies and interventions that improve QOL. Therefore, a potentially vast amount of internet-based QOL data is available for use in defining patient populations that may benefit from therapeutic intervention. Additionally, before undergoing breast conserving surgery, patients should be advised that their postoperative QOL depends not only on the success of the surgery, but also on their preoperative functional status.

Health-related quality of life in Asian patients with breast cancer: a systematic review

“…This could be due to the higher levels of, pain, breast symptoms and arm symptoms experienced by patients who had breast-conserving surgery as compared with those who had mastectomy. 59 60 Furthermore, other studies comparing breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy did not find associations with global health status 46 47 61 62 or overall well-being. 43 44 55 57 63 64 …”

“…Advanced stage disease was associated with poorer global health status 46 48 50 58 and poorer overall well-being. 52 …”

Quality of Life and Its Association with Physical Activity among Different Types of Cancer Survivors

“…Meanwhile, longer survival time makes QOL an even more important outcome measure for the population with metastatic disease, for whom a cure is probably not the goal. The significance of QOL of cancer survivors has been increasing recognized, as reflected by the growing number of investigations that have included QOL measures as part of their endpoints [9–13]. …”

A Non-Parametric Delphi Approach to Foster Innovation Policy Debate in Spain

“…This data intensive strategy has proven reliable in estimating statistics like averages and their confidence intervals [49], quantiles [50], or even p-values [51]. Non-parametric bootstrap is also appropriate when analyzing the results based on a Likert scale and different sample sizes (for example, smaller than 100 [52], larger than 1000 [53]). …”