2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.1056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clot in Transit: A Therapeutic Dilemma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When CIT is coupled with intermediate-risk PE, there is a very high mortality rate with no morbidity benefit when comparing treatment choices. Recent studies on CIT report mortality rates associated with various methods as follows: no therapy, anticoagulation therapy, surgical embolectomy, and thrombolysis at 100%, 28.6%, 23.8%, and 11.3% respectively [ 3 ]. Additionally, there has been no observable difference in long-term mortality among patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary emboli when comparing thrombolysis and anticoagulation alone as most deaths occur within 30 days of the original event [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When CIT is coupled with intermediate-risk PE, there is a very high mortality rate with no morbidity benefit when comparing treatment choices. Recent studies on CIT report mortality rates associated with various methods as follows: no therapy, anticoagulation therapy, surgical embolectomy, and thrombolysis at 100%, 28.6%, 23.8%, and 11.3% respectively [ 3 ]. Additionally, there has been no observable difference in long-term mortality among patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary emboli when comparing thrombolysis and anticoagulation alone as most deaths occur within 30 days of the original event [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%