2021
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing the loop: nonlinear Taylor vortex flow through the lens of resolvent analysis

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work uses Chebyshev differential matrix [34] to discretize the radial derivative operator in the MATLAB R2020b. It also validates the numerical data through setting 𝜂 = 0.714.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work uses Chebyshev differential matrix [34] to discretize the radial derivative operator in the MATLAB R2020b. It also validates the numerical data through setting 𝜂 = 0.714.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar considerations impact the development of numerical methods (Bazilevs et al. 2007), self-consistent mean flow modelling (Meliga 2017) and resolvent analysis (Padovan, Otto & Rowley 2020; Rigas, Sipp & Colonius 2021; Barthel, Zhu & McKeon 2021; Barthel, Gomez & McKeon 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It has been shown, however, that the nonlinear forcing may have little to no overlap with the leading forcing mode [8,15,32] resulting in χ 1 ≪ χ p =1 . This nonalignment stems from the fact that the resolvent does not model well the inter-scale nonlinear transfer.…”
Section: Cess Eddy Viscosity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%