2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81085-6_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing the Gap Between Knowledge and Implementation in Conservation Science: Concluding Remarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper joins recent calls for a pluralistic approach to biodiversity science and policy (Coscieme et al, 2020;Hunter et al, 2021;Klütsch & Ferreira, 2021;Obermeister, 2019;Pascual et al, 2021) and proposes to go one step further. We argue that plural perspectives cannot be achieved without multilingualism in the sources and processes, especially for organizing knowledge coproduction that underpins highlevel governance of science/policy initiatives such as those associated with the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).…”
Section: The Imp Ortan Ce Of L Ang Uag Ementioning
confidence: 74%
“…This paper joins recent calls for a pluralistic approach to biodiversity science and policy (Coscieme et al, 2020;Hunter et al, 2021;Klütsch & Ferreira, 2021;Obermeister, 2019;Pascual et al, 2021) and proposes to go one step further. We argue that plural perspectives cannot be achieved without multilingualism in the sources and processes, especially for organizing knowledge coproduction that underpins highlevel governance of science/policy initiatives such as those associated with the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).…”
Section: The Imp Ortan Ce Of L Ang Uag Ementioning
confidence: 74%
“…The technical developments and the combined efforts of research and management undertaken in CeMEB (e.g. through the two associated EU‐funded research programmes BaltGene and Bambi) have been highlighted by the European Commission as important for assessing the efficiency of the EU’s network of MPAs and defining management units ( https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/553na1_en‐eelgrass‐conservation‐insights.pdf ) and have contributed to the Swedish Government now starting up a genetic monitoring programme covering key aquatic species of Swedish lakes and coasts, including, for example, large spatial‐scale genomic assessment of eelgrass, bladderwrack, cod and herring at regular temporal intervals (briefly described in Klütsch & Laikre, 2021 ).…”
Section: Cemeb Scientific Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%