2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81085-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodiversity Monitoring and the Role of Scientists in the Twenty-first Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gap between the PA managers' perception and professional monitoring results comes from missing reference situations for the species and habitats, making any inter-temporal and inter-spatial comparison complicated. Therefore, we need rigid accuracy testing rules and solid reference baselines for the data inputs from 'citizen science' since any misjudgment about species, or habitat change can lead to inadequate management response [47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gap between the PA managers' perception and professional monitoring results comes from missing reference situations for the species and habitats, making any inter-temporal and inter-spatial comparison complicated. Therefore, we need rigid accuracy testing rules and solid reference baselines for the data inputs from 'citizen science' since any misjudgment about species, or habitat change can lead to inadequate management response [47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring at large spatial and temporal scales poses challenges [57][58][59]. Many attributes of landscapes are hard to measure, and the scale of interventions and the lack of clear and agreed indicator frameworks mean monitoring seldom provides data on long-term environmental and social impacts [60,9,61].…”
Section: Monitoring At Inadequate Spatial and Temporal Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data accessibility can also be blocked by a lack of capacity to identify, collate, and use the data (see below), as well as a lack of clear national policies and legislation on data sharing. Where data accessibility is not a barrier, data are frequently scattered, fragmented, of poor quality, and rarely available in the right format at the right time [4][5][6]113,139,140]. In some cases, such as with protected areas management in Kenya [7], data may be used for planning new reserves but less so in their management, where preventing poaching becomes a higher priority than biodiversity monitoring.…”
Section: Inadequate Data Availability Sharing Quality and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%