2013
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing in on maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence using a single multiphase flash of sub‐saturating intensity

Abstract: Estimation of the maximum chlorophyll fluorescence yield under illumination, or FmЈ, by traditional single saturation pulse (SP) methodology is prone to underestimation error because of rapid turnover within photosystem (PS) II. However, measurements of fluorescence yield during several single pulses of variable intensity describes the irradiance dependence of apparent FmЈ, from which estimates of FmЈ at infinite irradiance can be derived. While such estimates have been shown to result in valid approximations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm that LEF was not underestimated during measurements of v H+ /LEF, the LEF determined from the spectroscope was compared with that from the fluorimeter on the LI-COR 6400XT (6400-40 Leaf Chamber Fluorimeter; Li-Cor Biosciences). The multiphase flash protocol used in the LI-COR 6400XT produces saturating values of chlorophyll fluorescence even under subsaturating flash intensity to accurately determine F II (Loriaux et al, 2013). Values of LEF were similar when measured under identical conditions at ambient and low oxygen using either the spectroscope or the LI-COR multiphase flash (Supplemental Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To confirm that LEF was not underestimated during measurements of v H+ /LEF, the LEF determined from the spectroscope was compared with that from the fluorimeter on the LI-COR 6400XT (6400-40 Leaf Chamber Fluorimeter; Li-Cor Biosciences). The multiphase flash protocol used in the LI-COR 6400XT produces saturating values of chlorophyll fluorescence even under subsaturating flash intensity to accurately determine F II (Loriaux et al, 2013). Values of LEF were similar when measured under identical conditions at ambient and low oxygen using either the spectroscope or the LI-COR multiphase flash (Supplemental Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Gas-exchange analysis: measured at Pre-A and Post-A for the flag leaf in one plant per plot with a portable infra-red gas analyser (IRGA) system (LI-6400XTR and chamber 6400-40; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA), using the multiphase flash method [26]. Plant harvest and flag leaf preparation was carried out according to the methodology described by [27].…”
Section: Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambient conditions for A N -C i curves were equivalent to those for Laisk curves except that a flow rate of 300 mmol s 21 was used, and for leaves from the field the PPFD was set to 1,800 400,325,250,175,100,50,400,400,500,650,950,1,250,1,600, and 2,000 mmol mol 21 . At each CO 2 set point, gas-exchange parameters and steady state fluorescence (F s ) were logged, and a multiphase flash chlorophyll fluorescence routine was executed following the recommended procedures of Loriaux et al (2013) to determine the maximum fluorescence (F m 9). Following this response curve, the leaf was allowed to reacclimate to ambient conditions until net assimilation and g s returned to steady-state conditions.…”
Section: A N -C I Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%